Emery Carolyn A, Barlow Karen M, Brooks Brian L, Max Jeffrey E, Villavicencio-Requis Angela, Gnanakumar Vithya, Robertson Helen Lee, Schneider Kathryn, Yeates Keith Owen
Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Can J Psychiatry. 2016 May;61(5):259-69. doi: 10.1177/0706743716643741.
Evidence regarding longer-term psychiatric, psychological, and behavioural outcomes (for example, anxiety, mood disorders, depression, and attention disorders) following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in children and adolescents has not been previously synthesized.
To conduct a systematic review of the available evidence examining psychiatric, psychological, and behavioural outcomes following mTBI in children and adolescents.
Nine electronic databases were systematically searched from 1980 to August 2014. Studies selected met the following criteria: original data; study design was a randomized controlled trial, quasi-experimental design, cohort or historical cohort study, case-control study, or cross-sectional study; exposure included mTBI (including concussion); population included children and adolescents (<19 years) at the time of mTBI, as well as a comparison group (for example, healthy children, children with orthopaedic injuries); and included psychiatric, psychological, or behavioural outcomes (for example, anxiety, mood disorders, depression, attention disorders). Two authors independently assessed the quality and level of evidence with the Downs and Black (DB) criteria and Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) model, respectively, for each manuscript.
Of 9472 studies identified in the initial search, 30 were included and scored. Heterogeneity in methodology and injury definition precluded meta-analyses. The median methodological quality for all 30 studies, based on the DB criteria, was 15/33 (range 6 to 19). The highest level of evidence demonstrated by all reviewed studies was level 2b based on OCEBM criteria, with the majority (28/30 studies) classified at this level. Based on the literature included in this systematic review, psychological and psychiatric problems in children with a history of mTBI were found to be more prevalent when mTBI is associated with hospitalization, when assessment occurs earlier in the recovery period (that is, resolves over time), when there are multiple previous mTBIs, in individuals with preexisting psychiatric illness, when outcomes are based on retrospective recall, and when the comparison group is noninjured healthy children (as opposed to children with injuries not involving the head).
Overall, few rigorous prospective studies have examined psychological, behavioural, and psychiatric outcomes following mTBI. In the absence of true reports of preinjury problems and when ideally comparing mild TBI to non-TBI injured controls, there is little evidence to suggest that psychological, behavioural, and/or psychiatric problems persist beyond the acute and subacute period following an mTBI in children and adolescents.
此前尚未对儿童和青少年轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后的长期精神、心理和行为后果(如焦虑、情绪障碍、抑郁和注意力障碍)的相关证据进行综合分析。
对现有证据进行系统评价,以研究儿童和青少年mTBI后的精神、心理和行为后果。
对1980年至2014年8月期间的9个电子数据库进行系统检索。入选的研究符合以下标准:原始数据;研究设计为随机对照试验、准实验设计、队列研究或历史队列研究、病例对照研究或横断面研究;暴露因素包括mTBI(包括脑震荡);研究对象包括mTBI发生时的儿童和青少年(<19岁),以及一个对照组(如健康儿童、骨科损伤儿童);并包括精神、心理或行为后果(如焦虑、情绪障碍、抑郁、注意力障碍)。两位作者分别根据唐斯和布莱克(DB)标准以及牛津循证医学中心(OCEBM)模型,对每篇稿件的质量和证据水平进行独立评估。
在初步检索中识别出的9472项研究中,有30项被纳入并评分。方法学和损伤定义的异质性使得无法进行荟萃分析。根据DB标准,所有30项研究的方法学质量中位数为15/33(范围为6至19)。根据OCEBM标准,所有纳入综述的研究中最高证据水平为2b级,大多数研究(28/30项)属于该级别。基于本系统评价纳入的文献,发现有mTBI病史的儿童在以下情况下,心理和精神问题更为普遍:mTBI与住院相关、在恢复期早期进行评估(即随时间推移症状缓解)、既往有多次mTBI、有既往精神疾病、结局基于回顾性回忆以及对照组为未受伤的健康儿童(而非头部未受伤的儿童)。
总体而言,很少有严谨的前瞻性研究考察mTBI后的心理、行为和精神后果。在缺乏伤前问题真实报告且理想情况下将轻度TBI与未受伤的对照组进行比较时,几乎没有证据表明儿童和青少年mTBI后的心理、行为和/或精神问题会持续超过急性期和亚急性期。