Rahimi-Golkhandan S, Steenbergen B, Piek J P, Caeyenberghs K, Wilson P H
Centre for Disability and Development Research (CeDDR), Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.
Centre for Disability and Development Research (CeDDR), Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia; Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Brain Cogn. 2016 Jul;106:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 May 30.
Recent research suggests that children with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) often show deficits in executive functioning (EF) and, more specifically, the ability to use inhibitory control in 'hot', emotionally rewarding contexts. This study optimized the assessment of sensitivity of children with DCD to emotionally significant stimuli by using easily discriminable emotional expressions in a go/no-go task. Thirty-six children (12 with DCD), aged 7-12years, completed an emotional go/no-go task in which neutral facial expressions were paired with either happy or sad ones. Each expression was used as both, a go and no-go target in different runs of the task. There were no group differences in omission errors; however, the DCD group made significantly more commission errors to happy no-go faces. The particular pattern of performance in DCD confirms earlier reports of (hot) EF deficits. Specifically, a problem of inhibitory control appears to underlie the atypical pattern of performance seen in DCD on both cold and hot EF tasks. Disrupted coupling between cognitive control and emotion processing networks, such as fronto-parietal and fronto-striatal networks, may contribute to reduced inhibitory control in DCD. The implications for a broader theoretical account of DCD are discussed, as are implications for intervention.
近期研究表明,患有发育性协调障碍(DCD)的儿童通常在执行功能(EF)方面存在缺陷,更具体地说,在“热”的、有情感奖励的情境中运用抑制控制的能力存在缺陷。本研究通过在“是/否”任务中使用易于区分的情感表达,优化了对DCD儿童对情感显著刺激的敏感性评估。36名7至12岁的儿童(其中12名患有DCD)完成了一项情感“是/否”任务,在该任务中,中性面部表情与快乐或悲伤的表情配对。在任务的不同轮次中,每种表情既作为“是”目标,也作为“否”目标。在遗漏错误方面没有组间差异;然而,DCD组对快乐的“否”表情犯的错误明显更多。DCD组的特定表现模式证实了早期关于(热)EF缺陷的报道。具体而言,抑制控制问题似乎是DCD在冷EF和热EF任务中表现出的非典型模式的基础。认知控制与情感处理网络(如额顶叶和额纹状体网络)之间耦合的破坏,可能导致DCD中抑制控制能力下降。本文讨论了对DCD更广泛理论解释的意义以及对干预的意义。