Chen C Y, Zhang H Z, Jiang Z M, Zhou J, Chen J, Liu L
Department of Pathology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai 200233, China.
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Jun 8;45(6):387-92. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2016.06.007.
To investigate the value of combined application of MDM2, CDK4 and SATB2 immunohistochemistry in pathological diagnosis of low-grade osteosarcoma.
Forty-seven cases of low grade osteosarcoma, including low grade central osteosarcoma (n=20) and parosteal osteosarcoma (n=27), were selected from Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated the Sixth People's Hospital. The clinical, radiography and histopathology were reviewed. The sensitivity and specificity of MDM2, CDK4 and SATB2 immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of low-grade osteosarcoma were assessed along with an evaluation of their expressions in fibrous dysplasia, desmoplastic fibroma, low-grade fibrosarcoma and other fibrous tumors.
Low-grade osteosarcoma had protracted clinical course, occurring mostly in elder adults and mainly involving long bones. Radiographic studies showed that low-grade central osteosarcoma had a mainly malignant lytic presentation, however about 5/18 of tumors overlapping with intermediate and benign bone diseases, while parosteal osteosarcoma was characterized by a densely sclerotic malignant appearance. Histologically, low-grade osteosarcomas were characterized by well-differentiated spindle tumor cells, various mature tumor bones and an aggressive growth pattern. The positive expression rates of MDM2 and CDK4 in low-grade osteosarcoma were 74.5% and 55.3%, respectively. Eighty-three percent of low-grade osteosarcoma expressed one or both markers. Low-grade osteosarcoma and fibrous dysplasia were both positive for SATB2, while desmoplastic fibroma, low-grade fibrosacoma and other fibrous tumors were negative for SATB2.
Accurate diagnosis of low-grade osteosarcoma should be based on combination of clinical presentation, imaging and histopathology, with immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic adjunct. Positive immunostaining for CDK4 and/or MDM2 supports the diagnosis of low-grade osteosarcoma, but the negative one does not rule out such lesion. The negative expression of SATB2 is helpful to exclude fibrous tumors originating from bone with the exception of fibrous dysplasia.
探讨MDM2、CDK4和SATB2免疫组化联合应用在低级别骨肉瘤病理诊断中的价值。
选取上海交通大学附属第六人民医院的47例低级别骨肉瘤病例,包括20例低级别中央型骨肉瘤和27例骨旁骨肉瘤。回顾其临床、影像学和组织病理学资料。评估MDM2、CDK4和SATB2免疫组化在低级别骨肉瘤诊断中的敏感性和特异性,并评价它们在骨纤维异常增殖症、促纤维组织增生性纤维瘤、低级别纤维肉瘤及其他纤维性肿瘤中的表达情况。
低级别骨肉瘤临床病程迁延,多发生于成年人,主要累及长骨。影像学检查显示,低级别中央型骨肉瘤主要表现为恶性溶骨性改变,但约5/18的肿瘤与中间型和良性骨病重叠,而骨旁骨肉瘤表现为致密硬化性恶性外观。组织学上,低级别骨肉瘤的特征为分化良好的梭形肿瘤细胞、各种成熟的肿瘤骨及侵袭性生长方式。低级别骨肉瘤中MDM2和CDK4的阳性表达率分别为74.5%和55.3%。83%的低级别骨肉瘤表达一种或两种标志物。低级别骨肉瘤和骨纤维异常增殖症的SATB2均为阳性,而促纤维组织增生性纤维瘤、低级别纤维肉瘤及其他纤维性肿瘤的SATB2为阴性。
低级别骨肉瘤的准确诊断应基于临床表现、影像学和组织病理学的结合,免疫组化可作为诊断辅助手段。CDK4和/或MDM2免疫染色阳性支持低级别骨肉瘤的诊断,但阴性结果不能排除该病变。SATB2阴性表达有助于排除除骨纤维异常增殖症外的骨源性纤维性肿瘤。