Gurram Lavanya, Wadasadawala Tabassum, Joshi Kishor, Phurailatpam Reena, Paul Siji, Sarin Rajiv
Department of Radiation Oncology.
Department of Medical Physics, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research & Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Navi Mumbai, India.
J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2016 Apr;8(2):116-21. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2016.59195. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
The use of multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in early breast cancer (EBC) patients outside the trial setting has increased. Hence, there is a need to critically evaluate implant quality. Moreover, there is a scarcity of reports using an open cavity technique. We report the dosimetric indices of open and closed cavity MIB techniques.
The dosimetric parameters of 60 EBC patients treated with MIB (open and closed cavity) who underwent three dimensional, computerized tomography (CT) based planning for APBI from November 2011 to July 2015 were evaluated. Coverage Index (CI), Dose Homogeneity Index (DHI), Conformity Index (COIN), Plan Quality Index (PQI), and Dose Non-uniformity Index (DNR) were assessed.
Forty-one patients underwent open cavity and 19 patients underwent closed cavity placement of brachytherapy catheters. The median number of planes was 4 and median number of needles was 20. Median dose was 34 Gy with dose per fraction of 3.4 Gy, given twice a day, 6 hours apart. The D90 of the cavity and clinical target volume (CTV) were 105% and 89%, respectively. The median doses to the surgical clips were greater than 100%. The median CI of the cavity and CTV was 0.96 and 0.82, respectively. The DHI and COIN index of the CTV was 0.73 and 0.67. There were no significant differences in the dosimetric parameters based on whether the technique was done open or closed.
Critical evaluation of the dosimetric parameters of MIB-APBI is important for optimal results. While the open and closed techniques have similar dosimetry, our institutional preference is for an open technique which eases the procedure due to direct visualization of the tumor cavity.
在试验环境之外,多导管组织间近距离放射疗法(MIB)用于早期乳腺癌(EBC)患者的加速部分乳腺照射(APBI)的情况有所增加。因此,有必要严格评估植入质量。此外,使用开放腔技术的报告较少。我们报告了开放腔和封闭腔MIB技术的剂量学指标。
评估了2011年11月至2015年7月期间接受MIB(开放腔和封闭腔)治疗的60例EBC患者的剂量学参数,这些患者接受了基于三维计算机断层扫描(CT)的APBI计划。评估了覆盖指数(CI)、剂量均匀性指数(DHI)、适形指数(COIN)、计划质量指数(PQI)和剂量不均匀指数(DNR)。
41例患者接受了开放腔近距离放射治疗导管置入,19例患者接受了封闭腔置入。平面中位数为4,针数中位数为20。中位剂量为34 Gy,每次分割剂量为3.4 Gy,每天两次,间隔6小时。腔和临床靶体积(CTV)的D90分别为105%和89%。手术夹的中位剂量大于100%。腔和CTV的中位CI分别为0.96和0.82。CTV的DHI和COIN指数分别为0.73和0.67。基于技术是开放还是封闭,剂量学参数没有显著差异。
对MIB-APBI的剂量学参数进行严格评估对于获得最佳结果很重要。虽然开放和封闭技术的剂量学相似,但我们机构更倾向于开放技术,因为它可以通过直接观察肿瘤腔来简化操作。