Saksens Nicole T M, Lechanteur Yara T E, Verbakel Sanne K, Groenewoud Joannes M M, Daha Mohamed R, Schick Tina, Fauser Sascha, Boon Camiel J F, Hoyng Carel B, den Hollander Anneke I
Department of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Health Technology Assessment, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 3;11(6):e0144367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144367. eCollection 2016.
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a multifactorial disease, in which complement-mediated inflammation plays a pivotal role. A positive family history is an important risk factor for developing AMD. Certain lifestyle factors are shown to be significantly associated with AMD in non-familial cases, but not in familial cases. This study aimed to investigate whether the contribution of common genetic variants and complement activation levels differs between familial and sporadic cases with AMD.
1216 AMD patients (281 familial and 935 sporadic) and 1043 controls (143 unaffected members with a family history of AMD and 900 unrelated controls without a family history of AMD) were included in this study. Ophthalmic examinations were performed, and lifestyle and family history were documented with a questionnaire. Nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) known to be associated with AMD were genotyped, and serum concentrations of complement components C3 and C3d were measured. Associations were assessed in familial and sporadic individuals. The association with risk alleles of the age-related maculopathy susceptibility 2 (ARMS2) gene was significantly stronger in sporadic AMD patients compared to familial cases (p = 0.017 for all AMD stages and p = 0.003 for advanced AMD, respectively). ARMS2 risk alleles had the largest effect in sporadic cases but were not significantly associated with AMD in densely affected families. The C3d/C3 ratio was a significant risk factor for AMD in sporadic cases and may also be associated with familial cases. In patients with a densely affected family this effect was particularly strong with ORs of 5.37 and 4.99 for all AMD and advanced AMD respectively.
This study suggests that in familial AMD patients, the common genetic risk variant in ARMS2 is less important compared to sporadic AMD. In contrast, factors leading to increased complement activation appear to play a larger role in patients with a positive family history compared to sporadic patients. A better understanding of the different contributions of risk factors in familial compared to non-familial AMD will aid the development of reliable prediction models for AMD, and may provide individuals with more accurate information regarding their individual risk for AMD. This information is especially important for individuals who have a positive family history for AMD.
年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)是一种多因素疾病,其中补体介导的炎症起关键作用。阳性家族史是发生AMD的重要危险因素。某些生活方式因素在非家族性病例中显示与AMD显著相关,但在家族性病例中并非如此。本研究旨在调查常见基因变异和补体激活水平在家族性和散发性AMD病例中的贡献是否存在差异。
本研究纳入了1216例AMD患者(281例家族性和935例散发性)和1043名对照(143名有AMD家族史的未患病成员和900名无AMD家族史的无关对照)。进行了眼科检查,并用问卷记录了生活方式和家族史。对9个已知与AMD相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)进行基因分型,并测量血清补体成分C3和C3d的浓度。在家族性和散发性个体中评估关联性。与年龄相关性黄斑病变易感性2(ARMS2)基因的风险等位基因的关联在散发性AMD患者中比家族性病例显著更强(所有AMD阶段p = 0.017,晚期AMD p = 0.003)。ARMS2风险等位基因在散发性病例中影响最大,但在受累密集的家族中与AMD无显著关联。C3d/C3比值在散发性病例中是AMD的显著危险因素,在家族性病例中也可能相关。在受累密集的家族患者中,这种效应尤为强烈,所有AMD和晚期AMD的比值比分别为5.37和4.99。
本研究表明,与散发性AMD相比,在家族性AMD患者中,ARMS2中的常见基因风险变异不太重要。相反,与散发性患者相比,导致补体激活增加的因素在有阳性家族史的患者中似乎起更大作用。更好地理解家族性与非家族性AMD中危险因素的不同贡献将有助于开发可靠的AMD预测模型,并可能为个体提供关于其患AMD个体风险的更准确信息。这些信息对于有AMD阳性家族史的个体尤为重要。