Rosas-Salazar Christian, Walczak Stephen A, Kurland Geoffrey, Spahr Jonathan E
*Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonary Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN †Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergy, and Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2016 Jul;23(3):210-4. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000287.
Despite its widespread use as a diagnostic tool, the procedure for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) via flexible bronchoscopy is not standardized in children. Our objective was to examine the dissimilarities in fluid return between the different lobes in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopies with BAL.
We conducted a review of all pediatric flexible bronchoscopies with BAL conducted at a single institution over a 2-year period. Our predictor of interest was the site of the BAL. Our outcome of interest was the percent of fluid return. We used 1-way analysis of variance with subsequent pairwise comparisons for unadjusted analyses and multivariable linear regression for adjusted analyses.
We identified 529 procedures that met prespecified criteria. The mean (SD) percent of fluid return was 52.1 (14.4) for the right middle lobe, 50.7 (16.0) for the lingula (LIN), 50.5 (18.6) for the right or left upper lobes other than LIN (R/L-UL), and 42.2 (18.7) for the right or left lower lobes (R/L-LL). The R/L-LL had significantly lower fluid return when compared with each of the other lobes (P<0.05 for all pairwise comparisons); in contrast, there was no significant difference in fluid return between the other lobes. In our main analysis adjusting for potential confounders, performing the BAL in the right middle lobe, LIN, or R/L-UL increased the fluid return by 11.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.2-16.1], 9.5% (95% CI, 3.2-15.8), and 8.7% (95% CI, 0.9-16.5%), respectively, when compared with the R/L-LL.
Our results suggest that the lower lobes provide the lowest BAL fluid return in children, whereas the other lobes seem to perform similarly.
尽管支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)作为一种诊断工具被广泛使用,但儿童经可弯曲支气管镜进行支气管肺泡灌洗的操作尚未标准化。我们的目的是研究接受可弯曲支气管镜BAL检查的儿童不同肺叶灌洗后液体回流量的差异。
我们回顾了在一家机构2年内进行的所有儿童可弯曲支气管镜BAL检查。我们感兴趣的预测因素是BAL的部位。我们感兴趣的结果是液体回流百分比。我们使用单因素方差分析及随后的两两比较进行未调整分析,并使用多变量线性回归进行调整分析。
我们确定了529例符合预定标准的操作。右中叶的液体回流平均(标准差)百分比为52.1(14.4),舌叶(LIN)为50.7(16.0),除LIN外的右或左上叶(R/L-UL)为50.5(18.6),右或左下叶(R/L-LL)为42.2(18.7)。与其他各肺叶相比,R/L-LL的液体回流量显著更低(所有两两比较P<0.05);相比之下,其他肺叶之间的液体回流量无显著差异。在我们调整潜在混杂因素的主要分析中,与R/L-LL相比,在右中叶、LIN或R/L-UL进行BAL时,液体回流量分别增加了11.1%[95%置信区间(CI),6.2-16.1]、9.5%(95%CI,3.2-15.8)和8.7%(95%CI,0.9-16.5%)。
我们的结果表明,儿童下叶的BAL液体回流量最低,而其他肺叶的表现似乎相似。