Kassim Natasha A, Althouse Andrew D, Qin Dingxin, Leef George, Saba Samir
Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J Cardiol. 2017 Jan;69(1):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.02.022. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
Prior research has identified gender differences in the epidemiology and clinical management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The primary aim of this study is to systematically analyze a cohort of AF men and women and evaluate their baseline demographics, treatment, and clinical outcomes by gender.
We examined the records of 5976 (42% women) consecutive AF patients who were prescribed at least one anti-arrhythmic drug between 2006 and 2013. From this cohort, 4311 (72%) patients had anticoagulation data available and were included in the final analysis. Time to clinical events was assessed using survival analysis and adjusted for covariates using Cox regression.
Compared to men, women were older (73 years vs. 67 years, p<0.001), had higher CHADS scores (1.9 vs. 1.5, p<0.001), and fewer cardiac comorbidities. Compared to men, women were more often prescribed sotalol and less often dofetilide (p<0.001). Women were also less likely to be anticoagulated (76.8% vs. 82.5%, p<0.001). Over a mean follow-up of 40 months, women were more likely to die (HR 1.21, p=0.037) or to have an ischemic stroke (HR 1.35, p=0.058). Women also had higher rates of atrioventricular-nodal ablation (adjusted HR 2.11, p<0.001) and pacemaker implantation (adjusted HR 1.69, p<0.001) procedures, but lower rates of electrical cardioversions, AF ablations, and maze surgeries.
There are significant gender differences in baseline demographics and clinical outcomes of AF patients. Women have higher mortality and ischemic strokes and are less often prescribed anticoagulation therapy despite higher CHADS scores. These data have important clinical implications.
先前的研究已经确定了心房颤动(AF)在流行病学和临床管理方面的性别差异。本研究的主要目的是系统分析一组房颤男性和女性患者,并按性别评估他们的基线人口统计学特征、治疗情况和临床结局。
我们检查了2006年至2013年间连续就诊的5976例房颤患者(42%为女性)的记录,这些患者至少开具了一种抗心律失常药物。在这个队列中,4311例(72%)患者有抗凝数据并被纳入最终分析。使用生存分析评估临床事件发生时间,并使用Cox回归对协变量进行校正。
与男性相比,女性年龄更大(73岁对67岁,p<0.001),CHADS评分更高(1.9对1.5,p<0.001),心脏合并症更少。与男性相比,女性更常被开具索他洛尔,而多非利特的开具频率较低(p<0.001)。女性接受抗凝治疗的可能性也较小(76.8%对82.5%,p<0.001)。在平均40个月的随访中,女性更有可能死亡(风险比1.21,p=0.037)或发生缺血性中风(风险比1.35,p=0.058)。女性进行房室结消融(校正风险比2.11,p<0.001)和起搏器植入(校正风险比1.69,p<0.001)手术的比例也更高,但电复律、房颤消融和迷宫手术的比例较低。
房颤患者的基线人口统计学特征和临床结局存在显著的性别差异。女性死亡率和缺血性中风发生率更高,尽管CHADS评分更高,但接受抗凝治疗的频率更低。这些数据具有重要的临床意义。