School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Int J Surg. 2016 Jul;31:71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.060. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
Clinical diagnosis is accurate in only 80% of patients with suspected appendicitis with negative appendectomy rates of up to 21%. In the UK the use of standard-dose CT (SDCT) is conservative due to concerns over radiation exposure and resource implications. The use of low dose computer tomography (LDCT) instead of standard dose computer tomography (SDCT) may partially address these concerns.
To compare LDCT and SDCT in the diagnosis of appendicitis.
A literature search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases in July 2015 was conducted using the keywords 'low dose CT' and 'appendicitis'. Data were analysed and p values calculated using the Chi-square test. P values less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.
LDCT (1.2-5.3 mSv) was not inferior to SDCT (5.2-10.2 mSv) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and proposing alternative diagnoses. SDCT was superior to LDCT in the negative predictive value of diagnosis of appendiceal perforation. There was no significant difference between LDCT and SDCT in negative appendectomy rate, appendiceal perforation rate and the need for additional imaging.
LDCT is not inferior to SDCT in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and proposing alternative diagnoses. Further studies are recommended to further assess the potential role of LDCT & its cost effectiveness. Its use may improve the current management of patients with suspected acute appendicitis.
在疑似阑尾炎患者中,临床诊断的准确率仅为 80%,阴性阑尾切除率高达 21%。在英国,由于担心辐射暴露和资源影响,标准剂量 CT(SDCT)的使用较为保守。使用低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)代替标准剂量计算机断层扫描(SDCT)可能部分解决这些问题。
比较 LDCT 和 SDCT 在阑尾炎诊断中的应用。
2015 年 7 月,我们通过 EMBASE 和 MEDLINE 数据库检索了“低剂量 CT”和“阑尾炎”这两个关键词,并对数据进行了分析,采用卡方检验计算 p 值。p 值小于 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
LDCT(1.2-5.3mSv)在诊断急性阑尾炎和提出其他诊断方面并不逊于 SDCT(5.2-10.2mSv)。SDCT 在诊断阑尾穿孔的阴性预测值方面优于 LDCT。在阴性阑尾切除率、阑尾穿孔率和需要额外影像学检查方面,LDCT 和 SDCT 之间无显著差异。
LDCT 在诊断急性阑尾炎和提出其他诊断方面并不逊于 SDCT。进一步的研究推荐来进一步评估 LDCT 的潜在作用及其成本效益。它的使用可能会改善疑似急性阑尾炎患者的现有管理。