Chi Byung Hoon, Chang In Ho, Lee Dong Hoon, Park Sung Bin, Kim Kyung Do, Moon Young Tae, Hur Taekyu
Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei Med J. 2018 May;59(3):389-396. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.3.389.
To study the clinical application of low-dose unenhanced computed tomography with iterative reconstruction technique (LDCT-IR) on renal colic in the emergency department.
We conducted a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, and non-inferiority study. From March 2014 to August 2015, 112 patients with renal colic were included, and were randomized to either LDCT-IR (n=46) or standard-dose unenhanced CT (SDCT) (n=66) groups. The accuracy of urolithiasis diagnosis was the primary endpoint of this study. Radiation dose, size and location of the stone, hydronephrosis, other diseases except urolithiasis, and results of treatment were analyzed between the two groups.
The average effective dose radiation of SDCT was approximately four times higher than that of LDCT-IR (6.52 mSv vs. 1.63 mSv, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the accuracy of ureteral stone diagnosis between the two groups (LDCT-IR group: 96.97% vs. SDCT group: 98.96%, p=0.392). No significant difference was observed regarding the size and location of a stone, hydronephrosis, and diagnosis of other diseases, except urolithiasis. False negative results were found in two LDCT-IR patients and in one SDCT patient. In these patients, stones were misread as vascular calcification, and were difficult to diagnose because evidence of hydronephrosis and ureteral dilatation was not found.
LDCT-IR, as a first-line imaging test, was non-inferior to SDCT with respect to diagnosis of ureter stones, and was clinically available for the evaluation of renal colic.
研究低剂量非增强计算机断层扫描结合迭代重建技术(LDCT-IR)在急诊科肾绞痛中的临床应用。
我们进行了一项前瞻性、单盲、随机、非劣效性研究。2014年3月至2015年8月,纳入112例肾绞痛患者,随机分为LDCT-IR组(n = 46)和标准剂量非增强CT(SDCT)组(n = 66)。尿路结石诊断的准确性是本研究的主要终点。分析两组之间的辐射剂量、结石大小和位置、肾积水、除尿路结石外的其他疾病以及治疗结果。
SDCT的平均有效剂量辐射约为LDCT-IR的四倍(6.52 mSv对1.63 mSv,p<0.001)。两组输尿管结石诊断的准确性无显著差异(LDCT-IR组:96.97%对SDCT组:98.96%,p = 0.392)。除尿路结石外,在结石大小和位置、肾积水及其他疾病的诊断方面未观察到显著差异。在两名LDCT-IR患者和一名SDCT患者中发现假阴性结果。在这些患者中,结石被误读为血管钙化,且由于未发现肾积水和输尿管扩张的证据而难以诊断。
LDCT-IR作为一线成像检查,在输尿管结石诊断方面不劣于SDCT,临床上可用于评估肾绞痛。