Kim Jungho, Wang Hye-Young, Kim Seoyong, Park Soon Deok, Yu Kwangmin, Kim Hyo Youl, Uh Young, Lee Hyeyoung
Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do 26493, Republic of Korea.
M&D, Inc., Wonju Eco Environmental Technology Center, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do 26493, Republic of Korea.
J Microbiol Methods. 2016 Sep;128:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
DNA extraction efficiency affects the success of PCR-based method applications. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit for extracting DNA by using paper chromatography is technically easy to use and requires just two reagents and only 10min to complete. The Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit could be offered as a rapid, accurate, and convenient method for extracting bacterial and fungal DNA from blood culture bottles. We compared the efficiencies of the commercial kit (Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit) and an in-house conventional boiling method with Chelex-100 resin for DNA extraction from blood culture bottles. The efficiency of the two DNA extraction methods was assessed by PCR-reverse blot hybridization assay (PCR-REBA, REBA Sepsis-ID) for detecting Gram positive (GP) bacteria, Gram negative (GN) bacteria, and Candida species with 196 positive and 200 negative blood culture bottles. The detection limits of the two DNA extraction methods were 10(3)CFU/mL for GP bacteria, 10(3)CFU/mL for GN bacteria, and 10(4)CFU/mL for Candida. The sensitivity and specificity of the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit by REBA Sepsis-ID were 95.4% (187/196) and 100% (200/200), respectively. The overall agreement of the two DNA extraction methods was 98.9% (392/396). Three of four samples showing discrepant results between the two extraction methods were more accurately matched up with the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit based on conventional culture methods. The results indicated that the Punch-it™ NA-Sample kit extracted bacterial and fungal DNA in blood culture bottles and allowed extracted DNA to be used in molecular assay.
DNA提取效率会影响基于PCR方法的应用成功率。用于通过纸色谱法提取DNA的Punch-it™ NA-Sample试剂盒在技术上易于使用,仅需两种试剂,仅需10分钟即可完成。Punch-it™ NA-Sample试剂盒可以作为一种从血培养瓶中提取细菌和真菌DNA的快速、准确且便捷的方法。我们比较了商业试剂盒(Punch-it™ NA-Sample试剂盒)和一种采用Chelex-100树脂的内部常规煮沸法从血培养瓶中提取DNA的效率。通过PCR-反向印迹杂交分析(PCR-REBA,REBA Sepsis-ID)评估两种DNA提取方法从196份阳性和200份阴性血培养瓶中检测革兰氏阳性(GP)菌、革兰氏阴性(GN)菌和念珠菌属的效率。两种DNA提取方法的检测限分别为GP菌10(3)CFU/mL、GN菌10(3)CFU/mL和念珠菌10(4)CFU/mL。通过REBA Sepsis-ID检测,Punch-it™ NA-Sample试剂盒的灵敏度和特异性分别为95.4%(187/196)和100%(200/200)。两种DNA提取方法的总体一致性为98.9%(392/396)。在两种提取方法之间显示出差异结果的四个样本中,有三个根据传统培养方法与Punch-it™ NA-Sample试剂盒的匹配度更高。结果表明,Punch-it™ NA-Sample试剂盒能够从血培养瓶中提取细菌和真菌DNA,并使提取的DNA可用于分子检测。