Beckmann James T, Hung Man, Voss Maren W, Crum Anthony B, Bounsanga Jerry, Tyser Andrew R
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Jul;41(7):739-744.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.04.025. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity Computer Adaptive Test (UE CAT) has recently been made available by the National Institutes of Health to measure physical function outcomes in the upper extremity. We hypothesized that the UE CAT would psychometrically outperform the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test (PF CAT) in a hand patient population.
The UE CAT, PF CAT, and DASH were each electronically administered to all adult patients who presented to a tertiary hand and upper extremity (nonshoulder) orthopedic clinic. Patient responses were retrospectively studied to determine the validity, reliability, and floor/ceiling effects of all 3 instruments using the Rasch Partial Credit Model. Responder burden and Pearson correlations were calculated for each instrument.
A total of 379 patients completed the UE CAT, PF CAT, and the DASH. On average, 6 UE CAT, 9 PF CAT, and 30 DASH questions were administered to each patient. All 3 instruments were each highly correlated with each other. Floor effects were low and similar between all instruments; however, ceiling effects were higher in the UE CAT (10.82%) than in the PF CAT (1.32%) or DASH (5.28%). High person reliability (PR) and item reliability (IR) were found for all 3 metrics: UE CAT (α = 0.99; PR = 0.91; IR = 0.94); PF CAT (α = 0.95; PR = 0.89; IR = 0.96); and DASH (α = 0.97; PR = 0.95; IR = 0.99). The UE CAT questions had the best item-fit: only 1 of 15 UE CAT items had poor fit in contrast to 4 of 30 DASH items and 7 of 33 PF CAT items.
The psychometric properties of the UE CAT compare favorably with the PF CAT and the DASH in nonshoulder upper extremity patients. The relatively large ceiling effect found in the UE CAT could be improved with item bank expansion to include items at the upper end of function.
The UE CAT is a useful patient-reported outcome measure that merits further investigation.
美国国立卫生研究院最近推出了患者报告结局测量信息系统上肢计算机自适应测试(UE CAT),以测量上肢的身体功能结局。我们假设,在手部患者群体中,UE CAT在心理测量学方面将优于手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍量表(DASH)以及患者报告结局测量信息系统身体功能计算机自适应测试(PF CAT)。
对所有到三级手部和上肢(非肩部)骨科诊所就诊的成年患者,分别以电子方式 administered UE CAT、PF CAT和DASH。回顾性研究患者的回答,使用Rasch部分计分模型确定所有3种工具的效度、信度和地板效应/天花板效应。计算每种工具的应答者负担和皮尔逊相关性。
共有379名患者完成了UE CAT、PF CAT和DASH。平均每位患者接受了6个UE CAT问题、9个PF CAT问题和30个DASH问题。所有3种工具彼此之间都高度相关。所有工具的地板效应都很低且相似;然而,UE CAT的天花板效应(10.82%)高于PF CAT(1.32%)或DASH(5.28%)。所有3种指标都具有较高的人员信度(PR)和项目信度(IR):UE CAT(α = 0.99;PR = 0.91;IR = 0.94);PF CAT(α = 0.95;PR = 0.89;IR = 0.96);DASH(α = 0.97;PR = 0.95;IR = 0.99)。UE CAT问题的项目拟合度最佳:15个UE CAT项目中只有1个拟合度差,相比之下,30个DASH项目中有4个,33个PF CAT项目中有7个。
在非肩部上肢患者中,UE CAT的心理测量特性优于PF CAT和DASH。通过扩展题库以纳入功能上限的项目,可以改善UE CAT中相对较大的天花板效应。
UE CAT是一种有用的患者报告结局测量工具,值得进一步研究。