Gordon Dan, Pines Yaniv, Alben Matthew G, Ben-Ari Erel, Rokito Andrew S, Kwon Young W, Zuckerman Joseph D, Virk Mandeep S
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A.
Division of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb 6;5(2):e315-e324. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.11.021. eCollection 2023 Apr.
To assess the preoperative and postoperative performance of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS-UE, version 2.0) outcome score in comparison to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) instruments in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.
This prospective longitudinal study included 91 patients undergoing rotator cuff repair. Patients completed the PROMIS-UE, ASES, and WORC instruments preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months. The Pearson correlation coefficient () between these tools was calculated at each time point. Correlations were graded as excellent (>0.7), excellent-good (0.61-0.7), good (0.4-0.6), or poor (<0.4). Responsiveness to change was assessed using the effect size and the standardized response mean. Floor and ceiling effects for each instrument were also assessed.
The PROMIS-UE instrument showed good to excellent correlation with the legacy instruments at all time points. There were variations in the measured effect sizes of the various instruments, with the PROMIS-UE instrument showing responsiveness to change at 3 and 12 months but the ASES and WORC instruments showing responsiveness at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months. Both PROMIS-UE and ASES scores displayed ceiling effects at 12 months.
The PROMIS-UE instrument shows excellent correlation with the ASES instrument and a rotator cuff-specific outcome instrument-the WORC instrument-preoperatively and at 1 year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Variations in the measured effect sizes at different postoperative time points and high ceiling effects of the PROMIS-UE instrument at the 1-year time point may limit its utility in the early postoperative phase and at long-term follow-up after rotator cuff repair.
The performance of the PROMIS-UE outcome measure after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was investigated.
评估患者报告结局测量信息系统上肢版(PROMIS-UE,2.0版)结局评分在肩袖修复患者术前及术后的表现,并与美国肩肘外科医师协会(ASES)和西安大略肩袖指数(WORC)工具进行比较。
这项前瞻性纵向研究纳入了91例行肩袖修复的患者。患者在术前以及术后2周、6周、3个月和12个月完成PROMIS-UE、ASES和WORC工具的测评。计算每个时间点这些工具之间的Pearson相关系数()。相关性分为优秀(>0.7)、优秀-良好(0.61-0.7)、良好(0.4-0.6)或差(<0.4)。使用效应量和标准化反应均值评估对变化的反应性。还评估了每个工具的地板效应和天花板效应。
PROMIS-UE工具在所有时间点与传统工具均显示出良好至优秀的相关性。各种工具测量的效应量存在差异,PROMIS-UE工具在3个月和12个月时显示出对变化的反应性,而ASES和WORC工具在6周、3个月和12个月时显示出反应性。PROMIS-UE和ASES评分在12个月时均显示出天花板效应。
PROMIS-UE工具在术前及关节镜下肩袖修复术后1年与ASES工具以及肩袖特异性结局工具——WORC工具均显示出优秀的相关性。术后不同时间点测量的效应量存在差异,且PROMIS-UE工具在1年时间点的天花板效应较高,这可能会限制其在肩袖修复术后早期阶段和长期随访中的应用。
研究了关节镜下肩袖修复术后PROMIS-UE结局测量指标的表现。