Suppr超能文献

临床主观性。为沉默患者代言。

Clinical subjectivity. Advocacy with silent patients.

作者信息

Gadow S

机构信息

Institute for the Medical Humanities, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.

出版信息

Nurs Clin North Am. 1989 Jun;24(2):535-41.

PMID:2726575
Abstract

Advocacy typically has been understood as assistance to patients in giving voice to their values. With silent patients, however, advocacy involves more: the nurse speaking with the patient's voice. That dimension of advocacy represents its greatest challenge as a moral position. Other positions offer easier approaches to moral issues with silent patients. Utilitarianism and beneficence require little, if any, access to patient subjectivity. For the nurse committed to regard for patient self-determination, access to the subjective world of silent patients is crucial. That access is possible only when the nurse's voice, like the patient's, arises from the experience of embodiment. Silent patients cannot be represented by the words of bodiless advocates. Embodiment--of nurse and patient--is the avenue to subjectivity and the essential basis for a moral commitment to advocacy.

摘要

传统上,倡导通常被理解为帮助患者表达自己的价值观。然而,对于沉默的患者,倡导涉及更多:护士要以患者的声音说话。倡导的这一方面作为一种道德立场,是其最大的挑战。其他立场在处理沉默患者的道德问题时提供了更简便的方法。功利主义和行善原则几乎不需要(如果需要的话)了解患者的主观性。对于致力于尊重患者自我决定权的护士来说,进入沉默患者的主观世界至关重要。只有当护士的声音像患者的声音一样源于身体体验时,这种进入才有可能。沉默的患者不能由无实体的倡导者的话语来代表。护士和患者的身体体验是通向主观性的途径,也是对倡导做出道德承诺的基本基础。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验