Anderson Kevin L, Youngwirth Linda M, Scheri Randall P, Stang Michael T, Roman Sanziana A, Sosa Julie A
1 School of Medicine, Duke University, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina.
2 Department of Surgery, Duke University, Duke University Medical Center , Durham, North Carolina.
Thyroid. 2016 Aug;26(8):1046-52. doi: 10.1089/thy.2016.0073. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
The 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system trialed a subdivision of T1 tumors into T1a (<1 cm) and T1b (1.0-2 cm). The 2009 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines recommended total thyroidectomy for tumors >1 cm, and lobectomy for those ≤1 cm. These AJCC staging parameters remain a focus of debate, and ATA guidelines are in transition. The aim of this study was to determine if the T1 staging subdivision is associated with different treatment strategies and patterns of patient survival.
All adult patients with AJCC pT1 differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB; 1998-2012) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program (2004-2012) were divided into two groups based on tumor size: T1a versus T1b. Demographic, clinical, and pathologic features were evaluated. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with undergoing total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to determine factors associated with overall and disease-specific survival.
Among 149,912 DTC patients, 98,111 (65.4%) were T1a and 51,801 (34.6%) T1b in the NCDB; in SEER, among 18,381 patients, 11,208 (61.0%) had T1a and 7173 (39.0%) T1b tumors. Patients with T1b cancers were younger (48 vs. 51 years T1a) and more likely to have private insurance (76.2% vs. 74.1%), no comorbidities (86.0% vs. 83.8%), and undergo treatment at academic medical centers (41.4% vs. 40.3%; all p < 0.01). They also were more likely to undergo total thyroidectomy (87.7% vs. 74.3%), and had more lymphovascular invasion (10.2% vs. 3.3%), positive surgical margins (7.9% vs. 3.8%), metastatic lymph nodes (35.8% vs. 23.8%), and distant metastases (0.4% vs. 0.3%; all p < 0.01). Factors associated with radioactive-iodine use included younger patient age, lower income, having insurance, positive surgical margins, and T1b stage (p < 0.01). After adjustment, overall (p = 0.23) and disease-specific survival (p = 0.93) were similar among patients with T1a versus T1b tumors.
These results illustrate that patients with pT1a versus pT1b tumors undergo different treatment strategies. Based on the newly published 2015 ATA guidelines, whereby either lobectomy or total thyroidectomy can be performed for low-risk tumors, it might be anticipated that treatment differences will diminish over time. Therefore, division of AJCC T1 staging into T1a versus T1b subgroups might become obsolete over time.
美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第7版分期系统尝试将T1肿瘤细分为T1a(<1 cm)和T1b(1.0 - 2 cm)。2009年美国甲状腺协会(ATA)指南推荐对直径>1 cm的肿瘤行甲状腺全切术,对直径≤1 cm的肿瘤行甲状腺叶切除术。这些AJCC分期参数仍是争论的焦点,且ATA指南正在修订。本研究的目的是确定T1分期细分是否与不同的治疗策略及患者生存模式相关。
将来自国家癌症数据库(NCDB;1998 - 2012年)和监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)计划(2004 - 2012年)的所有成年AJCC pT1分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者按肿瘤大小分为两组:T1a组和T1b组。评估人口统计学、临床和病理特征。采用多因素回归分析确定与接受甲状腺全切术和放射性碘治疗相关的因素。进行Cox比例风险模型分析以确定与总生存和疾病特异性生存相关的因素。
在NCDB的149,912例DTC患者中,98,111例(65.4%)为T1a,51,801例(34.6%)为T1b;在SEER的18,381例患者中,11,208例(61.0%)为T1a肿瘤,7173例(39.0%)为T1b肿瘤。T1b期癌症患者更年轻(48岁对T1a期的51岁),更可能拥有私人保险(76.2%对74.1%),无合并症(86.0%对83.8%),且在学术医疗中心接受治疗(41.4%对40.3%;均p < 0.01)。他们也更可能接受甲状腺全切术(87.7%对7,4.3%),且有更多的淋巴管侵犯(10.2%对3.3%)、手术切缘阳性(7.9%对3.8%)、转移性淋巴结(35.8%对23.8%)和远处转移(0.4%对0.3%;均p < 0.01)。与使用放射性碘相关的因素包括患者年龄较小、收入较低、拥有保险、手术切缘阳性和T1b期(p < 0.01)。调整后,T1a和T1b肿瘤患者的总生存(p = 0.23)和疾病特异性生存(p = 0.93)相似。
这些结果表明,pT1a和pT1b肿瘤患者接受不同的治疗策略。基于新发布的2015年ATA指南,低风险肿瘤可行甲状腺叶切除术或甲状腺全切术,预计随着时间推移治疗差异将减小。因此,AJCC T1分期分为T1a和T1b亚组可能会随着时间推移而过时。