Suppr超能文献

分化型甲状腺癌患者肿瘤大小和最小甲状腺外侵犯的影响。

Effect of Tumor Size and Minimal Extrathyroidal Extension in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

机构信息

1 Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas.

2 Department of Endocrine Neoplasia and Hormonal Disorders, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Thyroid. 2018 Aug;28(8):982-990. doi: 10.1089/thy.2017.0513. Epub 2018 Jul 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Risk-stratified treatment strategies have become a focus in the treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). In the 2015 American Thyroid Association treatment guidelines, adjuvant treatment with radioactive iodine (RAI) is considered in the presence of minimal extrathyroidal extension (mETE). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of mETE and tumor size in patients with DTC.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of 2323 consecutive patients treated surgically for T1-T3 (defined per seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging criteria) and M0 DTC from 2000 to 2015 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patients were divided into four groups according to the size of the tumor (≤4 cm vs. >4 cm) and the presence of mETE. Predictors of disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival, locoregional failure (LRF), and distant metastatic failure (DMF) were compared using the log-rank test and Cox's proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

There were only seven DTC-related deaths, limiting the clinical significance of the analysis, especially of overall and disease-specific survival. Following multivariate analysis, patients with tumors >4 cm did worse than patients with tumors ≤4 cm with respect to DFS (group 3 [>4 cm without mETE] adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 2.1 [confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.8]; group 4 [>4 cm with mETE] HR = 2.9 [CI 1.6-5.1]). However, patients did not differ according to DFS, regardless of the presence of mETE within each size category (group 2 [≤4 cm with mETE] vs. group 1 [≤4 cm without mETE] HR = 1.3 [CI 0.9-1.8]; group 4 [>4 cm without mETE] vs. group 3 [>4 cm with mETE] HR = 1.0 [CI 0.5-2.3]). For LRF and DMF, size but not mETE was also an independent risk factor.

CONCLUSION

Tumor size, but not the presence of mETE, was an independent predictor of DFS, LRF, and DMF in DTC.

摘要

简介

风险分层治疗策略已成为分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)治疗的重点。在 2015 年美国甲状腺协会的治疗指南中,在存在微小甲状腺外延伸(mETE)的情况下考虑辅助放射性碘(RAI)治疗。本研究旨在探讨 mETE 和肿瘤大小在 DTC 患者中的预后意义。

方法

对 2000 年至 2015 年期间在德克萨斯大学 MD 安德森癌症中心接受手术治疗的 T1-T3(根据第七版美国癌症联合委员会分期标准定义)和 M0 DTC 的 2323 例连续患者进行回顾性分析。根据肿瘤大小(≤4cm 与>4cm)和 mETE 存在情况将患者分为四组。使用对数秩检验和 Cox 比例风险模型比较无病生存(DFS)、疾病特异性生存、局部区域失败(LRF)和远处转移失败(DMF)的预测因子。

结果

仅有 7 例与 DTC 相关的死亡,限制了分析的临床意义,尤其是总生存和疾病特异性生存。多因素分析后,肿瘤>4cm 的患者 DFS 较肿瘤≤4cm 的患者差(无 mETE 的组 3 [>4cm] 调整后的危险比(HR)=2.1 [95%置信区间(CI)1.1-3.8];有 mETE 的组 4 [>4cm] HR=2.9 [CI 1.6-5.1])。然而,无论每个大小类别中 mETE 的存在情况如何,患者的 DFS 均无差异(有 mETE 的组 2 [≤4cm] 与无 mETE 的组 1 [≤4cm] HR=1.3 [95%CI 0.9-1.8];无 mETE 的组 4 [>4cm] 与有 mETE 的组 3 [>4cm] HR=1.0 [95%CI 0.5-2.3])。对于 LRF 和 DMF,大小而不是 mETE 也是独立的危险因素。

结论

在 DTC 中,肿瘤大小而非 mETE 是 DFS、LRF 和 DMF 的独立预测因子。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验