Added Marco Aurélio Nemitalla, Costa Leonardo Oliveira Pena, de Freitas Diego Galace, Fukuda Thiago Yukio, Monteiro Renan Lima, Salomão Evelyn Cassia, de Medeiros Flávia Cordeiro, Costa Lucíola da Cunha Menezes
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Jul;46(7):506-13. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6590. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
Study Design Randomized controlled trial. Background Many clinical practice guidelines endorse both manual therapy and exercise as effective treatment options for patients with low back pain. To optimize the effects of the treatments recommended by the guidelines, a new intervention known as Kinesio Taping is being widely used in these patients. Objectives To determine the effectiveness of Kinesio Taping in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain when added to a physical therapy program consisting of exercise and manual therapy. Methods One hundred forty-eight patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain were randomly allocated to receive 10 (twice weekly) sessions of physical therapy, consisting of exercise and manual therapy, or the same treatment with the addition of Kinesio Taping applied to the lower back. The primary outcomes were pain intensity and disability (5 weeks after randomization) and the secondary outcomes were pain intensity, disability (3 months and 6 months after randomization), global perceived effect, and satisfaction with care (5 weeks after treatment). Data were collected by a blinded assessor. Results No between-group differences were observed in the primary outcomes of pain intensity (mean difference, -0.01 points; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.88, 0.85) or disability (mean difference, 1.14 points; 95% CI: -0.85, 3.13) at 5 weeks' follow-up. In addition, no between-group differences were observed for any of the other outcomes evaluated, except for disability 6 months after randomization (mean difference, 2.01 points; 95% CI: 0.03, 4.00) in favor of the control group. Conclusion Patients who received a physical therapy program consisting of exercise and manual therapy did not get additional benefit from the use of Kinesio Taping. Level of Evidence Therapy, level 1b. Prospectively registered May 28, 2013 at www.ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01866332). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(7):506-513. Epub 6 Jun 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6590.
随机对照试验。背景:许多临床实践指南认可手法治疗和运动疗法作为腰痛患者的有效治疗选择。为优化指南推荐治疗的效果,一种名为肌内效贴布的新干预措施正在这些患者中广泛应用。目的:确定在由运动疗法和手法治疗组成的物理治疗方案基础上增加肌内效贴布对慢性非特异性腰痛患者的有效性。方法:148例慢性非特异性腰痛患者被随机分配,一组接受为期10周(每周两次)的物理治疗,包括运动疗法和手法治疗;另一组接受相同治疗,但在腰部加用肌内效贴布。主要结局指标为疼痛强度和功能障碍(随机分组后5周),次要结局指标为疼痛强度、功能障碍(随机分组后3个月和6个月)、整体感知效果以及对治疗的满意度(治疗后5周)。数据由一名盲法评估者收集。结果:在5周随访时,疼痛强度(平均差值,-0.01分;95%置信区间[CI]:-0.88,0.85)或功能障碍(平均差值,1.14分;95%CI:-0.85,3.13)的主要结局指标在组间未观察到差异。此外,除随机分组后6个月的功能障碍(平均差值,2.01分;95%CI:0.03,4.00)有利于对照组外,在评估的任何其他结局指标上组间均未观察到差异。结论:接受由运动疗法和手法治疗组成的物理治疗方案的患者未从使用肌内效贴布中获得额外益处。证据级别:治疗,1b级。于2013年5月28日在www.ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT01866332)进行前瞻性注册。《骨科与运动物理治疗杂志》2016年;46(7):506 - 513。2016年6月6日在线发表。doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6590 。