College of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China; State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Vehicle Emission Control and Simulation, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China.
State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Vehicle Emission Control and Simulation, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology (CICAEET), Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China.
Environ Pollut. 2016 Sep;216:223-234. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.066. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
Vehicle emissions are greatly influenced by various factors that are related to engine technology and driving conditions. Only the fuel injection method and ambient temperature are investigated in this research. Regulated gaseous and particulate matter (PM) emissions from two advanced gasoline-fueled vehicles, one with direct fuel injection (GDI) and the other with port fuel injection (PFI), are tested with conventional gasoline and ethanol-blended gasoline (E10) at both -7 °C and 30 °C. The total particle number (PN) concentrations and size distributions are monitored with an Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI(+)). The solid PN concentrations are measured with a condensation particle counter (CPC) after removing volatile matters through the particle measurement program (PMP) system. The results indicate that decreasing the ambient temperature from 30 °C to -7 °C significantly increases the fuel consumption and all measured emissions except for NOx. The GDI vehicle exhibits lower fuel consumption than the PFI vehicle but emits more total hydrocarbons (THC), PM mass and solid PN emissions at 30 °C. The adaptability of GDI technology appears to be better than that of PFI technology at low ambient temperature. For example, the CO, THC and PM mass emission factors of the PFI vehicle are higher than those of the GDI vehicle and the solid PN emission factors are comparable in the cold-start tests at -7 °C. Specifically, during start-up the particulate matter emissions of the PFI are much higher than the GDI. In most cases, the geometric mean diameter (GMD) of the accumulation mode particles is 58-86 nm for both vehicles, and the GMD of the nucleation mode particles is 10-20 nm. The results suggest that the gaseous and particulate emissions from the PFI vehicle should not be neglected compared to those from the GDI vehicle especially in a cold environment.
车辆排放受多种因素影响,这些因素与发动机技术和驾驶条件有关。本研究仅调查了燃油喷射方式和环境温度。使用常规汽油和乙醇混合汽油(E10)在-7°C 和 30°C 下测试了两种先进的汽油燃料车辆(一种具有直喷燃油喷射(GDI),另一种具有进气道燃油喷射(PFI))的规定气态和颗粒物(PM)排放。使用电低压撞击器(ELPI(+))监测总颗粒数(PN)浓度和尺寸分布。使用凝聚粒子计数器(CPC)测量固体 PN 浓度,通过粒子测量程序(PMP)系统除去挥发性物质后。结果表明,环境温度从 30°C 降至-7°C 会显著增加燃料消耗和除 NOx 以外的所有测量排放物。GDI 车辆的燃料消耗低于 PFI 车辆,但在 30°C 时排放更多的总碳氢化合物(THC)、PM 质量和固体 PN 排放物。在低温环境下,GDI 技术的适应性似乎优于 PFI 技术。例如,PFI 车辆的 CO、THC 和 PM 质量排放因子高于 GDI 车辆,在-7°C 的冷启动测试中固体 PN 排放因子相当。具体而言,在启动过程中,PFI 的颗粒物排放明显高于 GDI。在大多数情况下,两种车辆的积累模态颗粒的几何平均直径(GMD)为 58-86nm,成核模态颗粒的 GMD 为 10-20nm。结果表明,与 GDI 车辆相比,PFI 车辆的气态和颗粒物排放不应被忽视,尤其是在寒冷环境中。