Karimzadeh Iman, Khalili Hossein
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, Iran.
Daru. 2016 Jun 6;24(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40199-016-0149-6.
Serum cystatin C (Cys C) has a number of advantages over serum creatinine in the evaluation of kidney function. Apart from Cys C level itself, several formulas have also been introduced in different clinical settings for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based upon serum Cys C level. The aim of the present study was to compare a serum Cys C-based equation with Cockcroft-Gault serum creatinine-based formula, both used in the calculation of GFR, in patients receiving amphotericin B. Fifty four adult patients with no history of acute or chronic kidney injury having been planned to receive conventional amphotericin B for an anticipated duration of at least 1 week for any indication were recruited. At three time points during amphotericin B treatment, including days 0, 7, and 14, serum cystatin C as well as creatinine levels were measured. GFR at the above time points was estimated by both creatinine (Cockcroft-Gault) and serum Cys C based equations. There was significant correlation between creatinine-based and Cys C-based GFR values at days 0 (R = 0.606, P = 0.001) and 7 (R = 0.714, P < 0.001). In contrast to GFR estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation, the mean (95 % confidence interval) Cys C-based GFR values at different studied time points were comparable within as well as between patients with and without amphotericin B nephrotoxicity. Our results suggested that the Gentian Cys C-based GFR equation correlated significantly with the Cockcroft-Gault formula at least at the early time period of treatment with amphotericin B. Graphical abstract Comparison between a serum creatinine-and a cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate equation in patients receiving amphotericin B.
在肾功能评估中,血清胱抑素C(Cys C)相较于血清肌酐具有诸多优势。除了Cys C水平本身外,在不同临床环境中还引入了几种基于血清Cys C水平估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)的公式。本研究的目的是比较基于血清Cys C的方程与基于Cockcroft-Gault血清肌酐的公式在接受两性霉素B治疗的患者中用于计算GFR的情况。招募了54例无急性或慢性肾损伤病史、计划接受常规两性霉素B治疗且预期疗程至少1周的成年患者,治疗指征不限。在两性霉素B治疗期间的三个时间点,即第0天、第7天和第14天,测量血清胱抑素C以及肌酐水平。通过基于肌酐(Cockcroft-Gault)和血清Cys C的方程估算上述时间点的GFR。在第0天(R = 0.606,P = 0.001)和第7天(R = 0.714,P < 0.001),基于肌酐的GFR值与基于Cys C的GFR值之间存在显著相关性。与通过Cockcroft-Gault方程估算的GFR不同,在有和无两性霉素B肾毒性的患者内部以及之间,不同研究时间点基于Cys C的GFR平均(95%置信区间)值具有可比性。我们的结果表明,至少在两性霉素B治疗的早期阶段,基于龙胆泻肝汤Cys C的GFR方程与Cockcroft-Gault公式显著相关。图形摘要:接受两性霉素B治疗患者中基于血清肌酐和基于胱抑素C的肾小球滤过率方程的比较