Ye Xiaoshuang, Wei Lu, Pei Xiaohua, Zhu Bei, Wu Jianqing, Zhao Weihong
Division of Nephrology, Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Division of Respiration, Department of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Sep 11;9:1539-49. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S68801. eCollection 2014.
No conventional creatinine- or cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation equation performed consistently outstandingly in elderly Chinese in our previous studies. This research aimed to further evaluate the performance of some recently proposed estimation equations based on creatinine and cystatin C, alone or combined, in this specific population.
The equations were validated in a population totaling 419 participants (median age 68 [range 60-94] years). The estimated GFR (eGFR) calculated separately by ten equations was compared with the reference GFR (rGFR) measured by the (99m)Tc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging method.
Median serum creatinine, cystatin C, and rGFR levels were 0.93 mg/L, 1.13 mg/L, and 74.20 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. The Chinese population-developed creatinine- and cystatin C-based (Cscr-cys) equation yielded the least median absolute difference (8.81 vs range 9.53-16.32, P<0.05, vs the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration serum creatinine equation), the highest proportion of eGFR within 15% and 30% of rGFR (P15 and P30, 55.13 and 85.44, P<0.05 and P<0.01, vs the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration serum creatinine equation), and the lowest root mean square error (14.87 vs range 15.30-22.45) in the whole cohort. A substantial agreement of diagnostic consistency between eGFR and rGFR (with a kappa 0.61-0.80) was also observed with the Cscr-cys equation. Moreover, measures of performance in the Cscr-cys equation were consistent across normal to mildly injured GFR strata and individuals aged ≤ 80 years. Among all the Cscr-cys equations, the elderly Chinese-developed creatinine-based (CEscr) equation performed best in this specific population. Nevertheless, none of the equations achieved ideal manifestation in the moderately to severely GFR-injured group or in individuals aged ≥ 80 years.
The Cscr-cys equation appeared to be optimal in elderly Chinese among the investigated equations. If cystatin C is not available, the CEscr equation is an acceptable alternative. A multicenter study with abundant subjects to develop an apposite formula for elderly Chinese is assumed to be essential.
在我们之前的研究中,没有一种基于传统肌酐或胱抑素C的肾小球滤过率(GFR)估算方程在老年中国人中表现一直非常出色。本研究旨在进一步评估一些最近提出的基于肌酐和胱抑素C单独或联合使用的估算方程在这一特定人群中的性能。
这些方程在总共419名参与者(中位年龄68岁[范围60 - 94岁])的人群中进行了验证。将十个方程分别计算的估算GFR(eGFR)与通过(99m)Tc - DTPA肾动态显像法测量的参考GFR(rGFR)进行比较。
血清肌酐、胱抑素C和rGFR的中位水平分别为0.93mg/L、1.13mg/L和74.20mL/min/1.73m²。中国人群研发的基于肌酐和胱抑素C的(Cscr - cys)方程产生的中位绝对差异最小(8.81,而范围为9.53 - 16.32,P<0.05,与慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组血清肌酐方程相比),eGFR在rGFR的15%和30%范围内的比例最高(P15和P30,分别为55.13和85.44,与慢性肾脏病流行病学协作组血清肌酐方程相比,P<0.05和P<0.01),并且在整个队列中的均方根误差最低(14.87,而范围为15.30 - 22.45)。使用Cscr - cys方程还观察到eGFR与rGFR之间在诊断一致性方面有实质性的一致性(kappa为0.61 - 0.80)。此外,Cscr - cys方程在正常至轻度受损的GFR分层和年龄≤80岁的个体中性能指标是一致的。在所有Cscr - cys方程中,中国老年人研发的基于肌酐的(CEscr)方程在这一特定人群中表现最佳。然而,没有一个方程在中度至重度GFR受损组或年龄≥80岁的个体中表现理想。
在研究的方程中,Cscr - cys方程在老年中国人中似乎是最优的。如果没有胱抑素C,CEscr方程是一个可接受的替代方案。开展一项有大量受试者参与的多中心研究以开发适合老年中国人的恰当公式被认为是至关重要的。