• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[住院危机干预后2至3年:进一步的住院治疗、当前调整及对索引治疗的回顾性主观评估]

[2 to 3 years following inpatient crisis intervention: further inpatient treatment, present adjustment and subjective assessment of the index treatment in retrospect].

作者信息

Kolitzus H, Feuerlein W

机构信息

Psychiatrische Klinik der Med. Hochschule Hannover.

出版信息

Psychiatr Prax. 1989 Mar;16(2):71-7.

PMID:2727192
Abstract

2-3 years after having been treated in a special crisis intervention inpatient department, 404 patients were asked to write down in an anonymous letter what kind of therapy they had since undergone, how they feel at present, and how they rate the treatment in retrospect. The main reasons for the crisis had been conflicts in partnership relations such as separation or divorce. The patients covered by the inquiry--about 40% of them had been treated directly after attempted suicide--had again consulted their family doctor (almost 80%) or a psychiatrist (slightly more than 40%). 50% of the patients who could be contacted, had since participated in individual or group therapy. 23% had to return to inpatient treatment. Feeling tone (according to a standard rating scale) was depressive in only 40% of the patients and normal in far more than one-half. Index treatment was considered as "unhelpful" by only 3.4% of the patients. More than 95% of the patients would recommend the crisis intervention ward to other patients, too.

摘要

在一个特殊的危机干预住院部接受治疗两到三年后,404名患者被要求以匿名信的形式写下他们此后接受了何种治疗、目前的感受以及对过往治疗的评价。引发危机的主要原因是伴侣关系中的冲突,如分居或离婚。接受调查的患者——其中约40%在自杀未遂后立即接受了治疗——再次咨询了他们的家庭医生(近80%)或精神科医生(略高于40%)。在能够取得联系的患者中,50%此后参加了个体或团体治疗。23%的患者不得不再次接受住院治疗。情绪基调(根据标准评分量表)只有40%的患者呈抑郁状态,超过一半的患者情绪正常。只有3.4%的患者认为索引治疗“没有帮助”。超过95%的患者也会向其他患者推荐危机干预病房。

相似文献

1
[2 to 3 years following inpatient crisis intervention: further inpatient treatment, present adjustment and subjective assessment of the index treatment in retrospect].[住院危机干预后2至3年:进一步的住院治疗、当前调整及对索引治疗的回顾性主观评估]
Psychiatr Prax. 1989 Mar;16(2):71-7.
2
[Value of a consultation center and crisis intervention in addressing psychiatric disorders in the perinatal period].[咨询中心及危机干预在解决围产期精神障碍问题中的价值]
Encephale. 2002 Jan-Feb;28(1):71-6.
3
Admission decisions following contact with an emergency mental health assessment and intervention service.在与紧急心理健康评估和干预服务机构接触后做出的入院决定。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jul;16(7):1313-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01302.x.
4
[Inpatient social psychiatric crisis intervention exemplified by the crisis intervention center of the Social Psychiatric University Clinic of Bern].[以伯尔尼社会精神病学大学诊所危机干预中心为例的住院社会精神病学危机干预]
Psychiatr Prax. 1984 May;11(3):67-73.
5
[Crisis intervention and psychiatric mortality].[危机干预与精神疾病死亡率]
Ann Med Psychol (Paris). 1993 Jan;151(1):33-46.
6
[Acute psychiatric day hospital treatment: is the effectiveness of this treatment approach still questionable?].[急性精神科日间医院治疗:这种治疗方法的有效性仍存疑问?]
Psychiatr Prax. 2004 Nov;31(8):409-19. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-815031.
7
[Inpatient crisis intervention in the general hospital: on the topic of the range of indications].[综合医院的住院危机干预:关于适应证范围的话题]
Psychiatr Prax. 1990 Nov;17(6):216-23.
8
[A community short-term crisis unit does not reduce acute admissions to psychiatric wards].[社区短期危机干预单元并不能减少精神科病房的急性入院人数]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009 Oct 8;129(19):1973-6. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.09.32349.
9
[Psychiatry in the general hospital--between crisis and chronicity].[综合医院中的精神病学——处于危机与慢性状态之间]
Psychiatr Prax. 1987 Aug;14 Suppl 1:47-51.
10
[Planned hospitalization after deliberate self-harm].[蓄意自伤后计划住院治疗]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2007 May 31;127(11):1521-3.