Suppr超能文献

BRCA1/2检测在高危乳腺癌/卵巢癌/男性乳腺癌家族中的敏感性:综合RNA/NGS panel检测贡献不大。

Sensitivity of BRCA1/2 testing in high-risk breast/ovarian/male breast cancer families: little contribution of comprehensive RNA/NGS panel testing.

作者信息

Byers Helen, Wallis Yvonne, van Veen Elke M, Lalloo Fiona, Reay Kim, Smith Philip, Wallace Andrew J, Bowers Naomi, Newman William G, Evans D Gareth

机构信息

Genomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Nov;24(11):1591-1597. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.57. Epub 2016 Jun 8.

Abstract

The sensitivity of testing BRCA1 and BRCA2 remains unresolved as the frequency of deep intronic splicing variants has not been defined in high-risk familial breast/ovarian cancer families. This variant category is reported at significant frequency in other tumour predisposition genes, including NF1 and MSH2. We carried out comprehensive whole gene RNA analysis on 45 high-risk breast/ovary and male breast cancer families with no identified pathogenic variant on exonic sequencing and copy number analysis of BRCA1/2. In addition, we undertook variant screening of a 10-gene high/moderate risk breast/ovarian cancer panel by next-generation sequencing. DNA testing identified the causative variant in 50/56 (89%) breast/ovarian/male breast cancer families with Manchester scores of ≥50 with two variants being confirmed to affect splicing on RNA analysis. RNA sequencing of BRCA1/BRCA2 on 45 individuals from high-risk families identified no deep intronic variants and did not suggest loss of RNA expression as a cause of lost sensitivity. Panel testing in 42 samples identified a known RAD51D variant, a high-risk ATM variant in another breast ovary family and a truncating CHEK2 mutation. Current exonic sequencing and copy number analysis variant detection methods of BRCA1/2 have high sensitivity in high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families. Sequence analysis of RNA does not identify any variants undetected by current analysis of BRCA1/2. However, RNA analysis clarified the pathogenicity of variants of unknown significance detected by current methods. The low diagnostic uplift achieved through sequence analysis of the other known breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility genes indicates that further high-risk genes remain to be identified.

摘要

由于在高危家族性乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族中,内含子深部剪接变异的频率尚未明确,检测BRCA1和BRCA2的敏感性仍未得到解决。在其他肿瘤易感基因中,包括NF1和MSH2,这类变异的报告频率很高。我们对45个高危乳腺癌/卵巢癌和男性乳腺癌家族进行了全面的全基因RNA分析,这些家族在外显子测序和BRCA1/2的拷贝数分析中未发现致病变异。此外,我们通过下一代测序对一个包含10个基因的高/中度风险乳腺癌/卵巢癌基因 panel 进行了变异筛查。DNA检测在50/56(89%)个曼彻斯特评分≥50的乳腺癌/卵巢癌/男性乳腺癌家族中确定了致病变异,其中两个变异经RNA分析证实会影响剪接。对45名高危家族个体的BRCA1/2进行RNA测序,未发现内含子深部变异,也未提示RNA表达缺失是敏感性丧失的原因。对42个样本进行的基因 panel 检测发现了一个已知的RAD51D变异、另一个乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族中的一个高危ATM变异以及一个截短的CHEK2突变。目前BRCA1/2的外显子测序和拷贝数分析变异检测方法在高危乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族中具有高敏感性。RNA序列分析未发现当前BRCA1/2分析未检测到的任何变异。然而,RNA分析阐明了当前方法检测到的意义未明变异的致病性。通过对其他已知乳腺癌/卵巢癌易感基因进行序列分析所获得的低诊断提升表明,仍有待鉴定更多的高危基因。

相似文献

1
BRCA1/2检测在高危乳腺癌/卵巢癌/男性乳腺癌家族中的敏感性:综合RNA/NGS panel检测贡献不大。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Nov;24(11):1591-1597. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.57. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
2
用于遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌分子诊断的下一代测序技术的应用凸显了其基因异质性。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Sep;159(2):245-56. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3948-z. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
3
4
在捷克共和国,高危先证者或有乳腺癌或卵巢癌先证者的 BRCA 基因和其他候选基因的突变频率。
Mol Biol Rep. 2020 Apr;47(4):2763-2769. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05378-7. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
7
特拉华州家族性胰腺癌的全州回顾性研究以及胰腺癌家族中基因突变的频率。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 May;23(5):1729-35. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-5026-x. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
8
携带 ATM 有害变异的个体所发展的乳腺肿瘤的形态学和基因组特征。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Apr 17;20(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-0951-9.

引用本文的文献

1
中国高危乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌患者及其家族中的种系与突变
J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 16;14(8):866. doi: 10.3390/jpm14080866.
3
奥拉帕利对携带奠基者突变 -del ex9-12的墨西哥卵巢癌患者的临床益处
Front Genet. 2022 Jun 6;13:863956. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.863956. eCollection 2022.
4
乳腺癌基因检测揭示先验概率的差异效应。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 18;13(16):4154. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164154.
5
从多基因风险评分到:乳腺癌相关基因中的突变相关风险。
Breast Care (Basel). 2021 Jun;16(3):202-213. doi: 10.1159/000515319. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
7
下一代测序技术在家族性乳腺癌/卵巢癌分析中的应用
High Throughput. 2020 Jan 10;9(1):1. doi: 10.3390/ht9010001.
10
通过杂交微型基因对DNA变异进行功能分类:鉴定BRCA2基因第17和18外显子的30个剪接变异体
PLoS Genet. 2017 Mar 24;13(3):e1006691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006691. eCollection 2017 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
基因panel测序与乳腺癌风险预测
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 4;372(23):2243-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1501341. Epub 2015 May 27.
2
携带有 PALB2 基因突变的家族中的乳腺癌风险。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Aug 7;371(6):497-506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400382.
3
成功预防和治疗乳腺癌的关键研究差距与转化优先事项
Breast Cancer Res. 2013 Oct 1;15(5):R92. doi: 10.1186/bcr3493.
4
BRCA2 深内含子突变导致隐匿外显子激活:开辟新的预防性治疗策略。
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Sep 15;18(18):4903-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1100. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
5
乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族中BRCA1/2突变的高敏感性:是否仍有其他乳腺癌/卵巢癌相关基因有待发现?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jul;134(2):895-7. doi: 10.1007/s10549-012-2130-5. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
7
家族性乳腺癌。
Clin Genet. 2012 Aug;82(2):105-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01859.x. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
8
RAD51D 种系突变使个体易患卵巢癌。
Nat Genet. 2011 Aug 7;43(9):879-882. doi: 10.1038/ng.893.
9
ATM 基因中的罕见变异与乳腺癌风险。
Breast Cancer Res. 2011 Jul 25;13(4):R73. doi: 10.1186/bcr2919.
10
家族性乳腺癌和卵巢癌中的胚系突变将 RAD51C 确立为人类癌症易感性基因。
Nat Genet. 2010 May;42(5):410-4. doi: 10.1038/ng.569. Epub 2010 Apr 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验