Byers Helen, Wallis Yvonne, van Veen Elke M, Lalloo Fiona, Reay Kim, Smith Philip, Wallace Andrew J, Bowers Naomi, Newman William G, Evans D Gareth
Genomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Nov;24(11):1591-1597. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.57. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
The sensitivity of testing BRCA1 and BRCA2 remains unresolved as the frequency of deep intronic splicing variants has not been defined in high-risk familial breast/ovarian cancer families. This variant category is reported at significant frequency in other tumour predisposition genes, including NF1 and MSH2. We carried out comprehensive whole gene RNA analysis on 45 high-risk breast/ovary and male breast cancer families with no identified pathogenic variant on exonic sequencing and copy number analysis of BRCA1/2. In addition, we undertook variant screening of a 10-gene high/moderate risk breast/ovarian cancer panel by next-generation sequencing. DNA testing identified the causative variant in 50/56 (89%) breast/ovarian/male breast cancer families with Manchester scores of ≥50 with two variants being confirmed to affect splicing on RNA analysis. RNA sequencing of BRCA1/BRCA2 on 45 individuals from high-risk families identified no deep intronic variants and did not suggest loss of RNA expression as a cause of lost sensitivity. Panel testing in 42 samples identified a known RAD51D variant, a high-risk ATM variant in another breast ovary family and a truncating CHEK2 mutation. Current exonic sequencing and copy number analysis variant detection methods of BRCA1/2 have high sensitivity in high-risk breast/ovarian cancer families. Sequence analysis of RNA does not identify any variants undetected by current analysis of BRCA1/2. However, RNA analysis clarified the pathogenicity of variants of unknown significance detected by current methods. The low diagnostic uplift achieved through sequence analysis of the other known breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility genes indicates that further high-risk genes remain to be identified.
由于在高危家族性乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族中,内含子深部剪接变异的频率尚未明确,检测BRCA1和BRCA2的敏感性仍未得到解决。在其他肿瘤易感基因中,包括NF1和MSH2,这类变异的报告频率很高。我们对45个高危乳腺癌/卵巢癌和男性乳腺癌家族进行了全面的全基因RNA分析,这些家族在外显子测序和BRCA1/2的拷贝数分析中未发现致病变异。此外,我们通过下一代测序对一个包含10个基因的高/中度风险乳腺癌/卵巢癌基因 panel 进行了变异筛查。DNA检测在50/56(89%)个曼彻斯特评分≥50的乳腺癌/卵巢癌/男性乳腺癌家族中确定了致病变异,其中两个变异经RNA分析证实会影响剪接。对45名高危家族个体的BRCA1/2进行RNA测序,未发现内含子深部变异,也未提示RNA表达缺失是敏感性丧失的原因。对42个样本进行的基因 panel 检测发现了一个已知的RAD51D变异、另一个乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族中的一个高危ATM变异以及一个截短的CHEK2突变。目前BRCA1/2的外显子测序和拷贝数分析变异检测方法在高危乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族中具有高敏感性。RNA序列分析未发现当前BRCA1/2分析未检测到的任何变异。然而,RNA分析阐明了当前方法检测到的意义未明变异的致病性。通过对其他已知乳腺癌/卵巢癌易感基因进行序列分析所获得的低诊断提升表明,仍有待鉴定更多的高危基因。