Kanaan Richard A, Armstrong David, Wessely Simon
Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia; Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Weston Education Centre, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
Department of General Practice, King's College London, Capital House, London, UK.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 May 11;12:1181-4. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S96330. eCollection 2016.
Since DSM-5 removed the requirement for a psychosocial formulation, neurologists have been able to make the diagnosis of conversion disorder without psychiatric input. We sought to examine whether neurologists and specialist psychiatrists concurred with this approach.
We used mixed methods, first surveying all the neurologists in the UK and then interviewing the neuropsychiatrists in a large UK region on the role of psychiatrists in diagnosing conversion disorder.
Of the surveyed neurologists, 76% did not think that psychiatrists were essential for the diagnosis and 71% thought that psychiatrists did not even consider conversion disorder when referred a case. The neuropsychiatrists who were interviewed held complex models of conversion disorder. They believed all cases could be explained psychosocially in theory, but the nature of the diagnostic encounter often prevented it in practice; all felt that psychosocial formulation could be very helpful and some felt that it was essential to diagnosis.
Although neurologists do not think psychiatrists are required for diagnosing conversion disorder, specialist psychiatrists disagree, at least in some cases.
由于《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)取消了对心理社会诊断的要求,神经科医生现在能够在无需精神科医生参与的情况下诊断转换障碍。我们试图研究神经科医生和精神科专科医生是否认同这种方法。
我们采用了混合研究方法,首先对英国所有神经科医生进行调查,然后就精神科医生在诊断转换障碍中的作用,对英国一个大地区的神经精神科医生进行访谈。
在接受调查的神经科医生中,76%认为精神科医生对于诊断并非必不可少,71%认为在转诊病例时精神科医生甚至不会考虑转换障碍。接受访谈的神经精神科医生持有复杂的转换障碍模型。他们认为理论上所有病例都可以从心理社会角度进行解释,但诊断过程的性质在实际中常常阻碍了这一点;所有人都觉得心理社会诊断对诊断很有帮助,有些人觉得这对诊断至关重要。
尽管神经科医生认为诊断转换障碍不需要精神科医生,但精神科专科医生不同意这一观点,至少在某些情况下是这样。