Schofield Robert M S, Choi Seunghee, Coon Joshua J, Goggans Matthew Scott, Kreisman Thomas F, Silver Daniel M, Nesson Michael H
Department of Physics , University of Oregon , Eugene, OR 97403 , USA.
Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics , Oregon State University , Corvallis, OR 97331 , USA.
Interface Focus. 2016 Jun 6;6(3):20160002. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0002.
Many of the materials that are challenging for large animals to cut or puncture are also cut and punctured by much smaller organisms that are limited to much smaller forces. Small organisms can overcome their force limitations by using sharper tools, but one drawback may be an increased susceptibility to fracture. We use simple contact mechanics models to estimate how much smaller the diameter of the tips or edges of tools such as teeth, claws and cutting blades must be in smaller organisms in order for them to puncture or cut the same materials as larger organisms. In order to produce the same maximum stress when maximum force scales as the square of body length, the diameter of the tool region that is in contact with the target material must scale isometrically for punch-like tools (e.g. scorpion stings) on thick targets, and for crushing tools (e.g. molars). For punch-like tools on thin targets, and for cutting blades on thick targets, the tip or edge diameters must be even smaller than expected from isometry in smaller animals. The diameters of a small sample of unworn punch-like tools from a large range of animal sizes are consistent with the model, scaling isometrically or more steeply (positively allometric). In addition, we find that the force required to puncture a thin target using real biological tools scales linearly with tip diameter, as predicted by the model. We argue that, for smaller tools, the minimum energy to fracture the tool will be a greater fraction of the minimum energy required to puncture the target, making fracture more likely. Finally, energy stored in tool bending, relative to the energy to fracture the tool, increases rapidly with the aspect ratio (length/width), and we expect that smaller organisms often have to employ higher aspect ratio tools in order to puncture or cut to the required depth with available force. The extra stored energy in higher aspect ratio tools is likely to increase the probability of fracture. We discuss some of the implications of the suggested scaling rules and possible adaptations to compensate for fracture sensitivity in smaller organisms.
许多对大型动物来说难以切割或刺穿的材料,也会被体型小得多、力量也小得多的生物切割和刺穿。小型生物可以通过使用更锋利的工具来克服其力量限制,但一个缺点可能是更容易断裂。我们使用简单的接触力学模型来估计,诸如牙齿、爪子和切割刀片等工具的尖端或边缘直径在较小生物体内必须小多少,才能使它们与大型生物一样刺穿或切割相同的材料。当最大力与体长的平方成正比时,为了产生相同的最大应力,对于厚目标上的冲头状工具(如蝎子蜇针)和用于碾碎的工具(如臼齿),与目标材料接触的工具区域的直径必须等比例缩放。对于薄目标上的冲头状工具以及厚目标上的切割刀片,尖端或边缘直径必须比小型动物等比例缩放所预期的还要小。从大范围动物体型中选取的一小部分未磨损冲头状工具的直径与模型一致,呈等比例缩放或缩放得更陡峭(正异速生长)。此外,我们发现,正如模型所预测的那样,使用真实生物工具刺穿薄目标所需的力与尖端直径呈线性关系。我们认为,对于较小的工具,使工具断裂所需的最小能量在刺穿目标所需的最小能量中所占比例会更大,从而使断裂更有可能发生。最后,相对于使工具断裂的能量,工具弯曲所储存的能量会随着长宽比(长度/宽度)迅速增加,而且我们预计,较小的生物通常不得不使用更高长宽比的工具,以便用可用的力量刺穿或切割到所需深度。更高长宽比工具中额外储存的能量可能会增加断裂的概率。我们讨论了所建议的缩放规则的一些含义,以及小型生物为补偿断裂敏感性可能做出的适应性变化。