Rodríguez-Rojas Jorge J, Arque-Chunga Wilfredo, Fernández-Salas Ildefonso, Rebollar-Téllez Eduardo A
1 Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Departamento de Zoología de Invertebrados, Laboratorio de Entomología Médica, Avenida Universidad s/n, Cd. Universitaria, CP 66451, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, México.
2 Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Centro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública (CRISP), Calle 4a Avenida Norte, Centro, CP 30700, Tapachula de Córdova y Ordoñez, Chiapas, México.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2016 Jun;32(2):103-16. doi: 10.2987/moco-32-02-103-116.1.
Phlebotominae are the vectors of Leishmania parasites. It is important to have available surveillance and collection methods for the sand fly vectors. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate and compare traps for the collection of sand fly species and to analyze trap catches along months and transects. Field evaluations over a year were conducted in an endemic area of leishmaniasis in the state of Quintana Roo, Mexico. A randomized-block design was implemented in study area with tropical rainforest vegetation. The study design utilized 4 transects with 11 trap types: 1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light trap with incandescent bulb (CDC-I), 2) CDC light trap with blue light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (CDC-B), 3) CDC light trap with white LEDs (CDC-W), 4) CDC light trap with red LEDs (CDC-R), 5) CDC light trap with green LEDs (CDC-G), 6) Disney trap, 7) Disney trap with white LEDs, 8) sticky panels, 9) sticky panels with white LEDs, 10) delta-like trap, and 11) delta-like trap with white LEDs. A total of 1,014 specimens of 13 species and 2 genera (Lutzomyia and Brumptomyia) were collected. There were significant differences in the mean number of sand flies caught with the 11 traps; CDC-I was (P = 0.0000) more effective than the other traps. Other traps exhibited the following results: CDC-W (17.46%), CDC-B (15.68%), CDC-G (14.89%), and CDC-R (14.30%). The relative abundance of different species varied according to trap types used, and the CDC-I trap attracted more specimens of the known vectors of Leishmania spp., such as like Lutzomyia cruciata, Lu. shannoni, and Lu. ovallesi. Disney trap captured more specimens of Lu. olmeca olmeca. Based on abundance and number of species, CDC light traps and Disney traps appeared to be good candidates for use in vector surveillance programs in this endemic area of Mexico.
白蛉亚科是利什曼原虫寄生虫的传播媒介。拥有针对白蛉传播媒介的监测和采集方法很重要。本研究的目的是评估和比较用于采集白蛉物种的诱捕器,并分析沿月份和样带的诱捕器捕获情况。在墨西哥金塔纳罗奥州的一个利什曼病流行地区进行了为期一年的实地评估。在具有热带雨林植被的研究区域采用了随机区组设计。该研究设计利用了4条样带和11种诱捕器类型:1)配备白炽灯泡的疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)灯光诱捕器(CDC-I),2)配备蓝色发光二极管(LED)的CDC灯光诱捕器(CDC-B),3)配备白色LED的CDC灯光诱捕器(CDC-W),4)配备红色LED的CDC灯光诱捕器(CDC-R),5)配备绿色LED的CDC灯光诱捕器(CDC-G),6)迪士尼诱捕器,7)配备白色LED的迪士尼诱捕器,8)粘性板,9)配备白色LED的粘性板,10)类三角诱捕器,以及11)配备白色LED的类三角诱捕器。共采集到13个物种、2个属(罗蛉属和布蛉属)的1014个标本。11种诱捕器捕获的白蛉平均数量存在显著差异;CDC-I诱捕器比其他诱捕器更有效(P = 0.0000)。其他诱捕器的结果如下:CDC-W(17.46%)、CDC-B(15.68%)、CDC-G(14.89%)和CDC-R(14.30%)。不同物种的相对丰度因所使用的诱捕器类型而异,CDC-I诱捕器吸引了更多利什曼原虫属已知传播媒介的标本,如克氏罗蛉、香农罗蛉和椭圆罗蛉。迪士尼诱捕器捕获了更多奥尔梅卡罗蛉奥尔梅卡亚种的标本。基于丰度和物种数量,CDC灯光诱捕器和迪士尼诱捕器似乎是墨西哥这个流行地区媒介监测项目的良好候选工具。