Suppr超能文献

为问责制医疗服务做好准备:在问责制医疗组织中实施变革的战略实践。

Aligning for accountable care: Strategic practices for change in accountable care organizations.

机构信息

Brian Hilligoss, PhD, MSIS, is Assistant Professor, Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus. E-mail:

出版信息

Health Care Manage Rev. 2017 Jul/Sep;42(3):192-202. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000110.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alignment within accountable care organizations (ACOs) is crucial if these new entities are to achieve their lofty goals. However, the concept of alignment remains underexamined, and we know little about the work entailed in creating alignment.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to develop the concept of aligning by identifying and describing the strategic practices administrators use to align the structures, processes, and behaviors of their organizations and individual providers in pursuit of accountable care.

APPROACH

We conducted 2-year qualitative case studies of four ACOs that have assumed full risk for the costs and quality of care for defined populations.

FINDINGS

Five strategic aligning practices were used by all four ACOs. Informing both aligns providers' understandings with the goals and value proposition of the ACO and aligns the providers' attention with the drivers of performance. Involving both aligns ACO leaders' understandings with the realities facing providers and aligns the policies of the ACO with the needs of providers. Enhancing both aligns the operations of individual provider practices with the operations of the ACO and aligns the trust of providers with the ACO. Motivating aligns what providers value with the goals of the ACO. Finally, evolving is a metapractice of learning and adapting that guides the execution of the other four practices.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Our findings suggest that there are second-order cognitive (e.g., understandings and attention) and cultural (e.g., trust and values) levels of alignment, as well as a first-order operational level (organizational structures, processes, and incentives). A well-aligned organization may require ongoing repositioning at each of these levels, as well as attention to both cooperative and coordinative dimensions of alignment. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

摘要

背景

如果要实现新实体的崇高目标,问责医疗组织(ACO)内部的协调至关重要。然而,协调的概念仍未得到充分研究,我们对创建协调所需的工作知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在通过识别和描述管理员用来协调其组织和个人提供者的结构、流程和行为,以追求问责制医疗的战略实践,从而发展协调的概念。

方法

我们对四个承担特定人群的成本和医疗质量完全风险的 ACO 进行了为期两年的定性案例研究。

发现

所有四个 ACO 都使用了五种战略协调实践。通知两者都使提供者的理解与 ACO 的目标和价值主张保持一致,并使提供者的注意力与绩效驱动因素保持一致。参与两者都使 ACO 领导者对提供者面临的现实情况有了更深入的了解,并使 ACO 的政策与提供者的需求保持一致。增强两者都使个体提供者实践的运营与 ACO 的运营保持一致,并使提供者对 ACO 的信任度提高。激励使提供者重视的内容与 ACO 的目标保持一致。最后,发展是一个学习和适应的元实践,指导其他四个实践的执行。

实践意义

我们的研究结果表明,存在二阶认知(例如,理解和注意力)和文化(例如,信任和价值观)层面的协调,以及一阶运营层面(组织结构、流程和激励措施)。一个协调良好的组织可能需要在这些层面上不断重新定位,并且需要关注协调的合作和协调维度。讨论了对研究和实践的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验