Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Aug 1;142(8):738-42. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.1107.
The indications for neonatal tracheostomy may have changed with current noninvasive respiratory therapies compared with previous decades.
To study the current trends in neonatal tracheostomy and identify the primary indication for the procedure and risk factors for failed extubation.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective medical record review included 47 neonates who underwent tracheostomy from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2013, at the University of Maryland Children's Hospital. Group 1 included infants undergoing tracheostomy for the primary indication of upper airway obstruction; group 2, infants with primary pulmonary disease. Data on weight, gestational age, comorbid conditions, congenital abnormalities, complications, outcomes, and indications for tracheostomy were compared statistically between groups.
Differences in gestational age, birth weight, and age at tracheostomy.
Among the 47 infants included in the study (30 boys; 17 girls, mean [SD] age, 113 [73] days), 31 (66%) demonstrated anatomical causes of airway obstruction, and 16 (34%) had significant pulmonary disease. Among infants with anatomical causes, subglottic stenosis represented the largest group (11 of 31 [35%]). The mean age at the time of tracheostomy was significantly lower in the group with airway obstruction (98.9 vs 146.9 days; difference, 48 [95% CI, 4.8-91.2] days; P = .04). No procedure-related morbidity or mortality was encountered.
Anatomical upper airway obstruction may be returning as the most common indication for a neonatal tracheostomy, thereby supporting the belief that current respiratory therapies have lowered the burden of chronic lung disease and the need for prolonged ventilatory care.
与前几十年相比,目前的非侵入性呼吸治疗可能改变了新生儿气管切开术的适应证。
研究新生儿气管切开术的当前趋势,并确定该手术的主要适应证和拔管失败的危险因素。
设计、设置和参与者:本回顾性病历研究纳入了 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日期间在马里兰大学儿童医院行气管切开术的 47 例新生儿。第 1 组包括因上呼吸道梗阻的主要适应证而接受气管切开术的婴儿;第 2 组包括原发性肺部疾病的婴儿。对两组间体重、胎龄、合并症、先天性异常、并发症、结局和气管切开术适应证进行统计学比较。
胎龄、出生体重和气管切开术年龄的差异。
在纳入研究的 47 例婴儿中(30 例男婴;17 例女婴,平均[SD]年龄为 113[73]天),31 例(66%)表现出气道梗阻的解剖学病因,16 例(34%)存在严重的肺部疾病。在有解剖学病因的婴儿中,声门下狭窄占比最大(31 例中的 11 例[35%])。气道梗阻组行气管切开术的平均年龄明显低于肺部疾病组(98.9 比 146.9 天;差异为 48[95%CI,4.8-91.2]天;P = .04)。未发生与手术相关的发病率或死亡率。
解剖学上的上呼吸道梗阻可能再次成为新生儿气管切开术最常见的适应证,这支持了这样一种观点,即目前的呼吸治疗降低了慢性肺部疾病的负担和对长期通气支持的需求。