Bhatia Anuj, Peng Philip, Cohen Steven P
From the *Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management and Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto; and †Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University Health Network-Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and ‡Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine & Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Jul-Aug;41(4):501-10. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000414.
Chronic knee pain from osteoarthritis or following arthroplasty is a common problem. A number of publications have reported analgesic success of radiofrequency (RF) procedures on nerves innervating the knee, but interpretation is hampered by lack of clarity regarding indications, clinical protocols, targets, and longevity of benefit from RF procedures.
We reviewed the following medical literature databases for publications on RF procedures on the knee joint for chronic pain: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar up to August 9, 2015. Data on scores for pain, validated scores for measuring physical disability, and adverse effects measured at any timepoint after 1 month following the interventions were collected, analyzed, and reported in this narrative review.
Thirteen publications on ablative or pulsed RF treatments of innervation of the knee joint were identified. A high success rate of these procedures in relieving chronic pain of the knee joint was reported at 1 to 12 months after the procedures, but only 2 of the publications were randomized controlled trials. There was evidence for improvement in function and a lack of serious adverse events of RF treatments.
Radiofrequency treatments on the knee joint (major or periarticular nerve supply or intra-articular branches) have the potential to reduce pain from osteoarthritis or persistent postarthroplasty pain. Ongoing concerns regarding the quality, procedural aspects, and monitoring of outcomes in publications on this topic remain. Randomized controlled trials of high methodological quality are required to further elaborate role of these interventions in this population.
骨关节炎或关节置换术后引起的慢性膝关节疼痛是一个常见问题。许多出版物报道了射频(RF)手术对支配膝关节神经的镇痛效果,但由于RF手术的适应症、临床方案、靶点以及获益的持久性缺乏明确性,影响了对其的解读。
我们检索了以下医学文献数据库,以获取有关膝关节慢性疼痛RF手术的出版物:MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库,以及截至2015年8月9日的谷歌学术。收集、分析并在本叙述性综述中报告干预后1个月后任何时间点测量的疼痛评分、测量身体残疾的有效评分以及不良反应的数据。
共确定了13篇关于膝关节神经支配的消融或脉冲RF治疗的出版物。这些手术在缓解膝关节慢性疼痛方面的成功率较高,术后1至12个月均有报道,但只有2篇出版物为随机对照试验。有证据表明RF治疗可改善功能且缺乏严重不良事件。
膝关节射频治疗(主要或关节周围神经供应或关节内分支)有可能减轻骨关节炎疼痛或关节置换术后持续性疼痛。关于该主题出版物的质量、程序方面和结果监测仍存在持续关注的问题。需要高质量的随机对照试验来进一步阐述这些干预措施在该人群中的作用。