Suppr超能文献

失效模式与效应分析在辅助生殖技术实验室中的应用

Application of failure mode and effect analysis in an assisted reproduction technology laboratory.

作者信息

Intra Giulia, Alteri Alessandra, Corti Laura, Rabellotti Elisa, Papaleo Enrico, Restelli Liliana, Biondo Stefania, Garancini Maria Paola, Candiani Massimo, Viganò Paola

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Infertility Unit, Fondazione Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Reprod Biomed Online. 2016 Aug;33(2):132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 24.

Abstract

Assisted reproduction technology laboratories have a very high degree of complexity. Mismatches of gametes or embryos can occur, with catastrophic consequences for patients. To minimize the risk of error, a multi-institutional working group applied failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to each critical activity/step as a method of risk assessment. This analysis led to the identification of the potential failure modes, together with their causes and effects, using the risk priority number (RPN) scoring system. In total, 11 individual steps and 68 different potential failure modes were identified. The highest ranked failure modes, with an RPN score of 25, encompassed 17 failures and pertained to "patient mismatch" and "biological sample mismatch". The maximum reduction in risk, with RPN reduced from 25 to 5, was mostly related to the introduction of witnessing. The critical failure modes in sample processing were improved by 50% in the RPN by focusing on staff training. Three indicators of FMEA success, based on technical skill, competence and traceability, have been evaluated after FMEA implementation. Witnessing by a second human operator should be introduced in the laboratory to avoid sample mix-ups. These findings confirm that FMEA can effectively reduce errors in assisted reproduction technology laboratories.

摘要

辅助生殖技术实验室具有高度的复杂性。配子或胚胎可能会出现错配,给患者带来灾难性后果。为了将出错风险降至最低,一个多机构工作组将失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)应用于每项关键活动/步骤,作为一种风险评估方法。该分析通过风险优先数(RPN)评分系统,识别出了潜在的失效模式及其原因和后果。总共识别出了11个独立步骤和68种不同的潜在失效模式。排名最高的失效模式,RPN评分为25,包括17项失误,涉及“患者错配”和“生物样本错配”。风险的最大降低,即RPN从25降至5,主要与引入见证有关。通过专注于员工培训,样本处理中的关键失效模式在RPN方面改善了50%。在实施FMEA后,基于技术技能、能力和可追溯性对FMEA成功的三个指标进行了评估。实验室应引入第二名操作人员进行见证,以避免样本混淆。这些发现证实,FMEA可以有效减少辅助生殖技术实验室中的错误。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验