• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外受精实验室中电子见证与人工见证程序的比较:对时间安排和效率的影响。

Comparison of electronic versus manual witnessing of procedures within the in vitro fertilization laboratory: impact on timing and efficiency.

作者信息

Holmes Rebecca, Wirka Kelly Athayde, Catherino Allison Baxter, Hayward Brooke, Swain Jason E

机构信息

CCRM Boston, Newton, Massachusetts.

EMD Serono, Inc. (a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Rockland, Massachusetts.

出版信息

F S Rep. 2021 Apr 28;2(2):181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.04.006. eCollection 2021 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.xfre.2021.04.006
PMID:34278352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8267391/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of an electronic witnessing system (EWS) on witnessing standard operating procedures and to assess embryologist perceptions of the EWS.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Private in vitro fertilization laboratory network.

PATIENTS

None.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The time difference between manual and electronic double-witnessing procedures, and embryologist perceptions of the EWS.

RESULTS

From 342 witnessing times analyzed (114 EWS, 114 manual, and 114 interruptions to witnesses), the EWS reduced mean (SD) total witnessing time (in seconds) by 91.5 (23.6) for intracytoplasmic sperm injection, 62.0 (17.9) for Day 3 embryo assessment, 58.3 (18.9) for fresh embryo transfer, and 59.4 (13.3) for frozen embryo transfer. This time reduction significantly decreased the overall time required for double-witnessing by 3.1- to 5.2-fold. A survey with 50 embryologists within the laboratory network indicated that most embryologists considered the EWS to improve sample traceability (78.3%), reduce errors in labeling issues (80.4%), and reduce the risk of sample mismatch errors by minimizing disruptions (60.9%). Furthermore, 82.6% thought that visual completion of the EWS dashboard provided peace of mind when leaving work and 84.8% were more confident knowing that all procedures were completed according to the EWS.

CONCLUSIONS

An EWS can improve laboratory efficiency by significantly decreasing the time required for witnessing procedures and by minimizing interruptions. The EWS was well perceived by embryologists and laboratory managers and enhanced their confidence and peace of mind with regard to witnessing compliance and safety/accuracy.

摘要

目的

评估电子见证系统(EWS)对见证标准操作程序的影响,并评估胚胎学家对EWS的看法。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

私立体外受精实验室网络。

患者

无。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

人工见证程序与电子双重见证程序之间的时间差,以及胚胎学家对EWS的看法。

结果

在分析的342次见证时间中(114次EWS见证、114次人工见证和114次见证中断),EWS使卵胞浆内单精子注射的平均(标准差)总见证时间(秒)减少了91.5(23.6),第三天胚胎评估减少了62.0(17.9),新鲜胚胎移植减少了58.3(18.9),冷冻胚胎移植减少了59.4(13.3)。时间的减少显著降低了双重见证所需的总时间,降低了3.1至5.2倍。对实验室网络内50名胚胎学家进行的一项调查表明,大多数胚胎学家认为EWS提高了样本可追溯性(78.3%),减少了标签问题中的错误(80.4%),并通过减少干扰降低了样本错配错误的风险(60.9%)。此外,82.6%的人认为EWS仪表板的可视化完成在下班时让人安心,84.8%的人在知道所有程序均根据EWS完成时更有信心。

结论

EWS可通过显著减少见证程序所需时间并减少干扰来提高实验室效率。胚胎学家和实验室管理人员对EWS评价良好,并增强了他们对见证合规性及安全/准确性的信心和安心感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb7/8267391/c0e7182c5dbf/figs2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb7/8267391/fbc7c0ff9ab5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb7/8267391/1860cad10546/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb7/8267391/5160541da797/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb7/8267391/c0e7182c5dbf/figs2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb7/8267391/fbc7c0ff9ab5/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb7/8267391/1860cad10546/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb7/8267391/5160541da797/figs1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb7/8267391/c0e7182c5dbf/figs2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of electronic versus manual witnessing of procedures within the in vitro fertilization laboratory: impact on timing and efficiency.体外受精实验室中电子见证与人工见证程序的比较:对时间安排和效率的影响。
F S Rep. 2021 Apr 28;2(2):181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.04.006. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Electronic witness system in IVF-patients perspective.从试管婴儿患者角度看电子见证系统。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Sep;33(9):1215-22. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0759-4. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
3
A Preliminary Experience of Integration of an Electronic Witness System, its Validation, Efficacy on Lab Performance, and Staff Satisfaction Assessment in a Busy Indian Fertilization Laboratory.印度一家繁忙的受精实验室中电子见证系统整合、验证、对实验室性能的功效及员工满意度评估的初步经验
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2020 Oct-Dec;13(4):333-339. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_66_20. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
4
Evaluation of fertilization, usable blastocyst development and sustained implantation rates according to intracytoplasmic sperm injection operator experience.根据卵胞浆内单精子注射操作者的经验评估受精、可利用的囊胚发育和持续着床率。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Jul;41(1):19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
5
Comprehensive protocol of traceability during IVF: the result of a multicentre failure mode and effect analysis.IVF 过程中可追溯性的综合方案:多中心失效模式和影响分析的结果。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1612-1620. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex144.
6
Failure mode and effects analysis of witnessing protocols for ensuring traceability during IVF.体外受精过程中确保可追溯性的见证协议的失效模式与影响分析。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Oct;31(4):516-22. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.06.018. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
7
Prospective study of automated versus manual annotation of early time-lapse markers in the human preimplantation embryo.前瞻性研究人类胚胎植入前早期时间点标记的自动与手动注释。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Aug 1;32(8):1604-1611. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex229.
8
Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study.胚胎学家在挑选单个第5天胚胎进行移植时的观察者间和观察者内一致性:一项多中心研究。
Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;32(2):307-314. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew330. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
9
Will the introduction of automated ART laboratory systems render the majority of embryologists redundant?自动化 ART 实验室系统的引入会使大多数胚胎学家失业吗?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Dec;43(6):979-981. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
10
The effect of ICSI-related procedural timings and operators on the outcome.卵胞浆内单精子注射相关操作时间和操作人员对结局的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Jan 1;35(1):32-43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez234.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived workplace stressors and professional experiences of clinical embryologists working in Italy and Spain: a pilot qualitative study.意大利和西班牙临床胚胎学家所感知到的工作场所压力源及职业经历:一项定性试点研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 18;13:1550715. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1550715. eCollection 2025.
2
Embryologist staffing in assisted reproductive technology laboratories: An international comparative review.辅助生殖技术实验室的胚胎学家配备:一项国际比较综述。
Reprod Med Biol. 2025 Jan 22;24(1):e12628. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12628. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
WISE: whole-scenario embryo identification using self-supervised learning encoder in IVF.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimum standards for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies: a committee opinion.提供辅助生殖技术的实践的最低标准:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2020 Mar;113(3):536-541. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.024. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
2
'There is only one thing that is truly important in an IVF laboratory: everything' Cairo Consensus Guidelines on IVF Culture Conditions.《体外受精实验室唯一真正重要的事情:一切》开罗体外受精培养条件共识指南。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2020 Jan;40(1):33-60. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.10.003. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
3
Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers.
WISE:使用 IVF 中基于自监督学习的胚胎自动识别编码器进行全面胚胎识别。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Apr;41(4):967-978. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03080-2. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
4
Using artificial intelligence to avoid human error in identifying embryos: a retrospective cohort study.利用人工智能避免识别胚胎时的人为错误:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Oct;39(10):2343-2348. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02585-y. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
扎根理论研究:新手研究者的设计框架。
SAGE Open Med. 2019 Jan 2;7:2050312118822927. doi: 10.1177/2050312118822927. eCollection 2019.
4
Types and frequency of non-conformances in an IVF laboratory.体外受精实验室中的不符合项的类型和频率。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;33(12):2196-2204. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey320.
5
Paving the way for a gold standard of care for infertility treatment: improving outcomes through standardization of laboratory procedures.为不孕治疗的黄金标准铺平道路:通过实验室程序标准化提高治疗效果。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Oct;35(4):391-399. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
6
Electronic witness system in IVF-patients perspective.从试管婴儿患者角度看电子见证系统。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 Sep;33(9):1215-22. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0759-4. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
7
Application of failure mode and effect analysis in an assisted reproduction technology laboratory.失效模式与效应分析在辅助生殖技术实验室中的应用
Reprod Biomed Online. 2016 Aug;33(2):132-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 24.
8
Revised guidelines for good practice in IVF laboratories (2015).体外受精实验室良好操作规范(2015 年版)
Hum Reprod. 2016 Apr;31(4):685-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew016. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
9
Failure mode and effects analysis of witnessing protocols for ensuring traceability during IVF.体外受精过程中确保可追溯性的见证协议的失效模式与影响分析。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Oct;31(4):516-22. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.06.018. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
10
Comprehensive evaluation of contemporary assisted reproduction technology laboratory operations to determine staffing levels that promote patient safety and quality care.综合评估当代辅助生殖技术实验室操作,以确定促进患者安全和优质护理的人员配备水平。
Fertil Steril. 2014 Nov;102(5):1350-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1246. Epub 2014 Sep 16.