Suppr超能文献

韩国国家内镜质量改进计划仍未达到最佳状态。

National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program Remains Suboptimal in Korea.

作者信息

Cha Jae Myung, Moon Jeong Seop, Chung Il-Kwun, Kim Jin-Oh, Im Jong Pil, Cho Yu Kyung, Kim Hyun Gun, Lee Sang Kil, Lee Hang Lak, Jang Jae Young, Kim Eun Sun, Jung Yunho, Moon Chang Mo, Kim Yeol, Park Bo Young

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Gut Liver. 2016 Sep 15;10(5):699-705. doi: 10.5009/gnl15623.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated the characteristics of the National Cancer Screening Program (NCSP) and opinions regarding the National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program (NEQIP).

METHODS

We surveyed physicians performing esophagogastroduodenoscopy and/or colonoscopy screenings as part of the NCSP via e-mail between July and August in 2015. The 32-item survey instrument included endoscopic capacity, sedation, and reprocessing of endoscopes as well as opinions regarding the NEQIP.

RESULTS

A total of 507 respondents were analyzed after the exclusion of 40 incomplete answers. Under the current capacity of the NCSP, the typical waiting time for screening endoscopy was less than 4 weeks in more than 90% of endoscopy units. Performance of endoscopy reprocessing was suboptimal, with 28% of respondents using unapproved disinfectants or not knowing the main ingredient of their disinfectants and 15% to 17% of respondents not following reprocessing protocols. Agreement with the NEQIP was optimal, because only 5.7% of respondents did not agree with NEQIP; however, familiarity with the NEQIP was suboptimal, because only 37.3% of respondents were familiar with the NEQIP criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The NEQIP remains suboptimal in Korea. Given the suboptimal performance of endoscopy reprocessing and low familiarity with the NEQIP, improved quality in endoscopy reprocessing and better understanding of the NEQIP should be emphasized in Korea.

摘要

背景/目的:我们评估了国家癌症筛查计划(NCSP)的特点以及对国家内镜质量改进计划(NEQIP)的看法。

方法

2015年7月至8月间,我们通过电子邮件对作为NCSP一部分进行食管胃十二指肠镜检查和/或结肠镜检查的医生进行了调查。这份包含32个条目的调查问卷涵盖了内镜检查能力、镇静情况、内镜再处理以及对NEQIP的看法。

结果

在排除40份不完整的回答后,共对507名受访者进行了分析。在NCSP目前的能力水平下,超过90%的内镜检查单位进行筛查性内镜检查的典型等待时间少于4周。内镜再处理的执行情况并不理想,28%的受访者使用未经批准的消毒剂或不知道其消毒剂的主要成分,15%至17%的受访者未遵循再处理方案。对NEQIP的认同度较高,因为只有5.7%的受访者不同意NEQIP;然而,对NEQIP的熟悉程度并不理想,因为只有37.3%的受访者熟悉NEQIP标准。

结论

在韩国,NEQIP仍然不够理想。鉴于内镜再处理的执行情况不佳以及对NEQIP的熟悉程度较低,韩国应强调提高内镜再处理质量以及更好地理解NEQIP。

相似文献

1
National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program Remains Suboptimal in Korea.
Gut Liver. 2016 Sep 15;10(5):699-705. doi: 10.5009/gnl15623.
2
Quality Indicators and Outcome Measures of Endoscopy in the National Cancer Screening Program.
Yonsei Med J. 2019 Nov;60(11):1054-1060. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.11.1054.
4
How to Improve the Quality of Screening Endoscopy in Korea: National Endoscopy Quality Improvement Program.
Clin Endosc. 2016 Jul;49(4):312-7. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.084. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
5
A nationwide survey on the effectiveness of training on endoscope reprocessing within the national cancer screening program in Korea.
Am J Infect Control. 2021 Aug;49(8):1031-1035. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
8
The current capacity and quality of colonoscopy in Korea.
Intest Res. 2019 Jan;17(1):119-126. doi: 10.5217/ir.2018.00060. Epub 2018 Oct 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial Differences in Bleeding Risk: An Ecological Epidemiological Study Comparing Korea and United Kingdom Subjects.
Thromb Haemost. 2024 Sep;124(9):842-851. doi: 10.1055/a-2269-1123. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
Safety of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Korea: A Nationwide Survey and Population-Based Study.
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Jan 24;37(4):e24. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e24.
4
Quality Indicators and Outcome Measures of Endoscopy in the National Cancer Screening Program.
Yonsei Med J. 2019 Nov;60(11):1054-1060. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.11.1054.
5
Establishing a model to measure and predict the quality of gastrointestinal endoscopy.
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb 28;25(8):1024-1030. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i8.1024.
7
Screening Upper Endoscopy for Early Detection of Gastric Cancer.
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 May 29;33(23):e190. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e190. eCollection 2018 Jun 4.
9
Education and Training Guidelines for the Board of the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Clin Endosc. 2017 Jul;50(4):345-356. doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.106. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
10
The Importance of an Endoscopic Quality Assessment Program Reflecting Real Practice.
Clin Endosc. 2016 Nov;49(6):495-497. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.137. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

2
Gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation and monitoring practices in Spain: a nationwide survey in the year 2014.
Endoscopy. 2015 Apr;47(4):383-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391672. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
4
[Quality improvement of gastrointestinal endoscopy in Korea: past, present, and future].
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec;64(6):320-32. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2014.64.6.320.
5
Quality indicators for colonoscopy.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):72-90. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.385. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
6
Quality indicators for EGD.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):60-71. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.384. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
7
Validity of fecal occult blood test in the national cancer screening program, Korea.
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 8;8(11):e79292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079292. eCollection 2013.
9
A review of current disinfectants for gastrointestinal endoscopic reprocessing.
Clin Endosc. 2013 Jul;46(4):337-41. doi: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.4.337. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
10
Performance of different gastric cancer screening methods in Korea: a population-based study.
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050041. Epub 2012 Nov 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验