Suppr超能文献

确定测量设备的有效性、可靠性、客观性和准确性的更好方法。

The better way to determine the validity, reliability, objectivity and accuracy of measuring devices.

作者信息

Pazira Parvin, Rostami Haji-Abadi Mahdi, Zolaktaf Vahid, Sabahi Mohammadfarzan, Pazira Toomaj

机构信息

Department of Sports Sciences, School of Sports Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Department of Electrical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Work. 2016 Jun 8;54(3):495-505. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162310.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In relation to statistical analysis, studies to determine the validity, reliability, objectivity and precision of new measuring devices are usually incomplete, due in part to using only correlation coefficient and ignoring the data dispersion.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the best way to determine the validity, reliability, objectivity and accuracy of an electro-inclinometer or other measuring devices. Another purpose of this study is to answer the question of whether reliability and objectivity represent accuracy of measuring devices.

METHODS

The validity of an electro-inclinometer was examined by mechanical and geometric methods. The objectivity and reliability of the device was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha for repeated measurements by three raters and by measurements on the same person by mechanical goniometer and the electro-inclinometer. Measurements were performed on "hip flexion with the extended knee" and "shoulder abduction with the extended elbow." The raters measured every angle three times within an interval of two hours. The three-way ANOVA was used to determine accuracy.

RESULTS

The results of mechanical and geometric analysis showed that validity of the electro-inclinometer was 1.00 and level of error was less than one degree. Objectivity and reliability of electro-inclinometer was 0.999, while objectivity of mechanical goniometer was in the range of 0.802 to 0.966 and the reliability was 0.760 to 0.961. For hip flexion, the difference between raters in joints angle measurement by electro-inclinometer and mechanical goniometer was 1.74 and 16.33 degree (P<0.05), respectively. The differences for shoulder abduction measurement by electro-inclinometer and goniometer were 0.35 and 4.40 degree (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although both the objectivity and reliability are acceptable, the results showed that measurement error was very high in the mechanical goniometer. Therefore, it can be concluded that objectivity and reliability alone cannot determine the accuracy of a device and it is preferable to use other statistical methods to compare and evaluate the accuracy of these two devices.

摘要

背景

在统计分析方面,用于确定新型测量设备有效性、可靠性、客观性和精度的研究通常并不完整,部分原因是仅使用相关系数而忽略了数据离散度。

目的

本研究旨在证明确定电子倾斜仪或其他测量设备有效性、可靠性、客观性和准确性的最佳方法。本研究的另一个目的是回答可靠性和客观性是否代表测量设备准确性的问题。

方法

通过机械和几何方法检验电子倾斜仪的有效性。通过计算三名评估者重复测量的克朗巴哈系数以及使用机械测角仪和电子倾斜仪对同一人进行测量来评估该设备的客观性和可靠性。测量“伸膝时的髋关节屈曲”和“伸肘时的肩关节外展”。评估者在两小时内对每个角度测量三次。使用三因素方差分析来确定准确性。

结果

机械和几何分析结果表明,电子倾斜仪的有效性为1.00,误差水平小于1度。电子倾斜仪的客观性和可靠性为0.999,而机械测角仪的客观性在0.802至0.966范围内,可靠性在0.760至0.961范围内。对于髋关节屈曲,电子倾斜仪和机械测角仪在关节角度测量上评估者之间的差异分别为1.74度和16.33度(P<0.05)。电子倾斜仪和测角仪在肩关节外展测量上的差异分别为0.35度和4.40度(P<0.05)。

结论

虽然客观性和可靠性都可以接受,但结果表明机械测角仪的测量误差非常高。因此,可以得出结论,仅靠客观性和可靠性不能确定设备的准确性,最好使用其他统计方法来比较和评估这两种设备的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验