Low Chuen Siang, Ho Jacqueline J, Nallusamy Revathy
Penang Medical College, Penang, 10450, Malaysia.
Department of Pediatrics, Penang Medical College, Penang, Malaysia.
World J Pediatr. 2016 Nov;12(4):450-454. doi: 10.1007/s12519-016-0037-7. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
Most of the evidence on early feeding of preterm infants was derived from high income settings, it is equally important to evaluate whether it can be successfully implemented into less resourced settings. This study aimed to compare growth and feeding of preterm infants before and after the introduction of a new aggressive feeding policy in Penang Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital in a middle income country.
The new aggressive feeding policy was developed mainly from Cochrane review evidence, using early parenteral and enteral nutrition with standardized breastfeeding counselling aimed at empowering mothers to provide early expressed milk. A total of 80 preterm babies (34 weeks and below) discharged from NICU were included (40 pre- and 40 post-intervention). Pre and post-intervention data were compared. The primary outcome was growth at day 7, 14, 21 and at discharge and secondary outcomes were time to full oral feeding, breastfeeding rates, and adverse events.
Complete data were available for all babies to discharge. One baby was discharged prior to day 14 and 10 babies before day 21, so growth data for these babies were unavailable. Baseline data were similar in the two groups. There was no significant weight difference at 7, 14, 21 days and at discharge. More post-intervention babies were breastfed at discharge than pre-intervention babies (21 vs. 8, P=0.005). Nosocomial infection (11 vs. 4, P=0.045), and blood transfusion were significantly lower in the postintervention babies than in the pre-intervention babies (31 vs. 13, P=0.01). The post-intervention babies were more likely to achieve shorter median days (interquartile range) to full oral feeding [11 (6) days vs. 13 (11) days, P=0.058] and with lower number affecting necrotising enterocolitis (0 vs. 5, P=0.055).
Early aggressive parenteral nutrition and early provision of mother's milk did not result in improved growth as evidenced by weight gain at discharge. However we found more breastfeeding babies, lower nosocomial infection and transfusion rates. Our findings suggest that implementing a more aggressive feeding policy supported by high level scientific evidence is able to improve important outcomes.
关于早产儿早期喂养的大多数证据来自高收入地区,评估其能否在资源较少的地区成功实施同样重要。本研究旨在比较马来西亚槟城一家中等收入国家的三级转诊医院——槟城医院引入新的积极喂养政策前后早产儿的生长和喂养情况。
新的积极喂养政策主要依据Cochrane系统评价证据制定,采用早期肠外和肠内营养,并提供标准化的母乳喂养咨询,旨在帮助母亲提供早期挤出的母乳。共有80名从新生儿重症监护病房出院的早产儿(孕周34周及以下)纳入研究(干预前40例,干预后40例)。比较干预前后的数据。主要结局指标为出生后第7天、14天、21天及出院时的生长情况,次要结局指标为完全经口喂养的时间、母乳喂养率及不良事件。
所有婴儿均有完整的出院数据。1例婴儿在第14天前出院,10例婴儿在第21天前出院,因此这些婴儿的生长数据缺失。两组的基线数据相似。在第7天、14天、21天及出院时,体重差异无统计学意义。干预后出院时进行母乳喂养的婴儿比干预前更多(21例 vs. 8例,P = 0.005)。干预后婴儿的医院感染发生率(11例 vs. 4例,P = 0.045)和输血率显著低于干预前婴儿(31例 vs. 13例,P = 0.01)。干预后婴儿达到完全经口喂养的中位天数(四分位间距)更短[11(6)天 vs. 13(11)天,P = 0.058],坏死性小肠结肠炎的发生率更低(0例 vs. 5例,P = 0.055)。
出院时体重增加情况表明,早期积极的肠外营养和早期提供母乳并未改善生长情况。然而,我们发现母乳喂养的婴儿更多,医院感染和输血率更低。我们的研究结果表明,实施一项由高水平科学证据支持的更积极的喂养政策能够改善重要结局。