Hoffman Howard J, Rawal Shristi, Li Chuan-Ming, Duffy Valerie B
Epidemiology and Statistics Program, Division of Scientific Programs, National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.
Epidemiology Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), NIH, Rockville, MD, USA.
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016 Jun;17(2):221-40. doi: 10.1007/s11154-016-9364-1.
The U.S. NHANES included chemosensory assessments in the 2011-2014 protocol. We provide an overview of this protocol and 2012 olfactory exam findings. Of the 1818 NHANES participants aged ≥40 years, 1281 (70.5 %) completed the exam; non-participation mostly was due to time constraints. Health technicians administered an 8-item, forced-choice, odor identification task scored as normosmic (6-8 odors identified correctly) versus olfactory dysfunction, including hyposmic (4-5 correct) and anosmic/severe hyposmic (0-3 correct). Interviewers recorded self-reported smell alterations (during past year, since age 25, phantosmia), histories of sinonasal problems, xerostomia, dental extractions, head or facial trauma, and chemosensory-related treatment and changes in quality of life. Olfactory dysfunction was found in 12.4 % (13.3 million adults; 55 % males/45 % females) including 3.2 % anosmic/severe hyposmic (3.4 million; 74 % males/26 % females). Selected age-specific prevalences were 4.2 % (40-49 years), 12.7 % (60-69 years), and 39.4 % (80+ years). Among adults ≥70 years, misidentification rates for warning odors were 20.3 % for smoke and 31.3 % for natural gas. The highest sensitivity (correctly identifying dysfunction) and specificity (correctly identifying normosmia) of self-reported olfactory alteration was among anosmics/severe hyposmics (54.4 % and 78.1 %, respectively). In age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression analysis, risk factors of olfactory dysfunction were racial/ethnic minority, income-to-poverty ratio ≤ 1.1, education <high school, and heavy drinking. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity reduced risk of impairment. Olfactory dysfunction is prevalent, particularly among older adults. Inexpensive, brief odor identification tests coupled with questions (smell problems past year, since age 25, phantosmia) could screen for marked dysfunction. Healthcare providers should be prepared to offer education on non-olfactory avoidance of hazardous events.
美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)在2011 - 2014年方案中纳入了化学感觉评估。我们概述了该方案及2012年嗅觉检查结果。在1818名年龄≥40岁的NHANES参与者中,1281人(70.5%)完成了检查;未参与主要是由于时间限制。健康技术人员进行了一项包含8个项目的强迫选择气味识别任务,得分分为嗅觉正常(正确识别6 - 8种气味)与嗅觉功能障碍,后者包括嗅觉减退(正确识别4 - 5种)和嗅觉缺失/严重嗅觉减退(正确识别0 - 3种)。访谈者记录了自我报告的嗅觉改变(过去一年、25岁以来、嗅觉幻觉)、鼻窦问题史、口干、拔牙、头部或面部创伤以及与化学感觉相关的治疗和生活质量变化。发现12.4%(1330万成年人;55%为男性/45%为女性)存在嗅觉功能障碍,其中3.2%为嗅觉缺失/严重嗅觉减退(340万;74%为男性/26%为女性)。特定年龄组的患病率分别为4.2%(40 - 49岁)、12.7%(60 - 69岁)和39.4%(80岁及以上)。在70岁及以上成年人中,对烟雾警报气味的误识率为20.3%,对天然气警报气味的误识率为31.3%。自我报告的嗅觉改变在嗅觉缺失/严重嗅觉减退者中具有最高的敏感度(正确识别功能障碍)和特异度(正确识别嗅觉正常)(分别为54.4%和78.1%)。在年龄和性别调整的逻辑回归分析中,嗅觉功能障碍的危险因素为少数种族/族裔、收入贫困比≤1.1、教育程度低于高中以及大量饮酒。中度至剧烈的体育活动可降低受损风险。嗅觉功能障碍很普遍,尤其是在老年人中。廉价、简短的气味识别测试以及相关问题(过去一年、25岁以来的嗅觉问题、嗅觉幻觉)可筛查出明显的功能障碍。医疗保健提供者应准备好提供关于非嗅觉方式避免危险事件的教育。