Rüther Tobias, Ruderer Amelie, Wirth Christina, Schuler Veronika, Lang Verena, Linhardt Andrea, Kröger Christoph B, Pogarell Oliver
Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Eur Addict Res. 2016;22(5):268-76. doi: 10.1159/000446430. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
The present study investigated the feasibility, acceptance and efficacy of a newly developed cognitive behavioral program for smoking cessation/reduction ('Rethink your Smoking' program, RSP) in inpatients with substance use disorder (SUD).
One hundred ninety-nine inpatients with SUD were randomly assigned to either the RSP (n = 101) or a minimal intervention (MI) program (n = 98). In addition, participants were offered optional nicotine replacement therapy. Data from a group of patients with SUD without any intervention (control group, n = 78) were included in the analyses for comparison. Assessments were performed at admission, discharge and follow-up after 3 and 6 months.
RSP proved to be feasible and was well accepted by participants. Patients in both interventions showed lower scores for physical nicotine dependence and number of cigarettes smoked per day and higher scores for various motivational parameters at discharge and 3 months later. Both interventions were superior to no intervention, but no differences were found between the RSP and MI.
A smoking cessation/reduction program is feasible for substance-dependent in-patients undergoing detoxification. Although the RSP appears to be effective in terms of harm reduction in in-patients with SUD, more cost- and time-efficient programs might also be suitable for this population.
本研究调查了一种新开发的用于戒烟/减少吸烟量的认知行为项目(“重新思考你的吸烟行为”项目,RSP)在物质使用障碍(SUD)住院患者中的可行性、可接受性和有效性。
199名SUD住院患者被随机分配到RSP组(n = 101)或最小干预(MI)项目组(n = 98)。此外,为参与者提供了可选的尼古丁替代疗法。一组未经任何干预的SUD患者(对照组,n = 78)的数据被纳入分析以作比较。在入院时、出院时以及3个月和6个月后的随访时进行评估。
RSP被证明是可行的,并且被参与者很好地接受。两种干预措施下的患者在出院时和3个月后,身体对尼古丁的依赖得分和每日吸烟量均较低,各种动机参数得分较高。两种干预措施均优于无干预,但RSP和MI之间未发现差异。
对于正在接受戒毒治疗的物质依赖住院患者,戒烟/减少吸烟量项目是可行的。尽管RSP在减少SUD住院患者的危害方面似乎有效,但更具成本效益和时间效益的项目可能也适用于该人群。