Suppr超能文献

托珠单抗、甲氨蝶呤或二者联合治疗早期类风湿关节炎(U-Act-Early):一项多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟、策略试验。

Early rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab, methotrexate, or their combination (U-Act-Early): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, strategy trial.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Division of Rheumatology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2016 Jul 23;388(10042):343-355. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30363-4. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis, treatment aim is early, rapid, and sustained remission. We compared the efficacy and safety of strategies initiating the interleukin-6 receptor-blocking monoclonal antibody tocilizumab with or without methotrexate (a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [DMARD]), versus initiation of methotrexate monotherapy in line with international guidelines.

METHODS

We did a 2-year, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, strategy study at 21 rheumatology outpatient departments in the Netherlands. We included patients who had been diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis within 1 year before inclusion, were DMARD-naive, aged 18 years or older, met current rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria, and had a disease activity score assessing 28 joints (DAS28) of at least 2·6. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1) to start tocilizumab plus methotrexate (the tocilizumab plus methotrexate arm), or tocilizumab plus placebo-methotrexate (the tocilizumab arm), or methotrexate plus placebo-tocilizumab (the methotrexate arm). Tocilizumab was given at 8 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks with a maximum of 800 mg per dose. Methotrexate was started at 10 mg per week orally and increased stepwise every 4 weeks by 5 mg to a maximum of 30 mg per week, until remission or dose-limiting toxicity. We did the randomisation using an interactive web response system. Masking was achieved with placebos that were similar in appearance to the active drug; the study physicians, pharmacists, monitors, and patients remained masked during the study, and all assessments were done by masked assessors. Patients not achieving remission on their initial regimen switched from placebo to active treatments; patients in the tocilizumab plus methotrexate arm switched to standard of care therapy (typically methotrexate combined with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor). When sustained remission was achieved, methotrexate (and placebo-methotrexate) was tapered and stopped, then tocilizumab (and placebo-tocilizumab) was also tapered and stopped. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving sustained remission (defined as DAS28 <2·6 with a swollen joint count ≤four, persisting for at least 24 weeks) on the initial regimen and during the entire study duration, compared between groups with a two-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Analysis was based on an intention-to-treat method. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01034137.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 13, 2010, and July 30, 2012, we recruited and assigned 317 eligible patients to treatment (106 to the tocilizumab plus methotrexate arm, 103 to the tocilizumab arm, and 108 to the methotrexate arm). The study was completed by a similar proportion of patients in the three groups (range 72-78%). The most frequent reasons for dropout were adverse events or intercurrent illness: 27 (34%) of dropouts, and insufficient response: 26 (33%) of dropouts. 91 (86%) of 106 patients in the tocilizumab plus methotrexate arm achieved sustained remission on the initial regimen, compared with 86 (84%) of 103 in the tocilizumab arm, and 48 (44%) of 108 in the methotrexate arm (relative risk [RR] 2·00, 95% CI 1·59-2·51 for tocilizumab plus methotrexate vs methotrexate, and 1·86, 1·48-2·32 for tocilizumab vs methotrexate, p<0·0001 for both comparisons). For the entire study, 91 (86%) of 106 patients in the tocilizumab plus methotrexate arm, 91 (88%) of 103 in the tocilizumab arm, and 83 (77%) of 108 in the methotrexate arm achieved sustained remission (RR 1·13, 95% CI 1·00-1·29, p=0·06 for tocilizumab plus methotrexate vs methotrexate, 1·14, 1·01-1·29, p=0·0356 for tocilizumab vs methotrexate, and p=0·59 for tocilizumab plus methotrexate vs tocilizumab). Nasopharyngitis was the most common adverse event in all three treatment groups, occurring in 38 (36%) of 106 patients in the tocilizumab plus methotrexate arm, 40 (39%) of 103 in the tocilizumab arm, and 37 (34%) of 108 in the methotrexate arm. The occurrence of serious adverse events did not differ between the treatment groups (17 [16%] of 106 patients in the tocilizumab plus methotrexate arm vs 19 [18%] of 103 in the tocilizumab arm and 13 [12%] of 108 in the methotrexate arm), and no deaths occurred during the study.

INTERPRETATION

For patients with newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis, strategies aimed at sustained remission by immediate initiation of tocilizumab with or without methotrexate are more effective, and with a similar safety profile, compared with initiation of methotrexate in line with current standards.

FUNDING

Roche Nederland BV.

摘要

背景

对于新诊断为类风湿关节炎的患者,治疗目标是早期、快速和持续缓解。我们比较了起始使用白细胞介素-6 受体拮抗剂托珠单抗联合或不联合甲氨蝶呤(一种常规合成的疾病修正抗风湿药物[DMARD])与按照国际指南起始甲氨蝶呤单药治疗的策略在疗效和安全性方面的差异。

方法

我们在荷兰 21 个风湿病门诊进行了一项为期 2 年的、多中心、随机、双盲、双模拟、策略研究。纳入的患者在纳入前 1 年内被诊断为类风湿关节炎,为 DMARD 初治患者,年龄在 18 岁或以上,符合当前类风湿关节炎分类标准,且疾病活动度评估 28 个关节(DAS28)至少为 2.6。我们将患者(1:1:1)随机分配到托珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤组(托珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤组)、托珠单抗联合安慰剂-甲氨蝶呤组(托珠单抗组)或甲氨蝶呤联合安慰剂-托珠单抗组(甲氨蝶呤组)。托珠单抗起始剂量为 8mg/kg,每 4 周静脉输注 1 次,每次剂量最高 800mg。甲氨蝶呤起始剂量为每周 10mg,每 4 周递增 5mg,最高剂量为每周 30mg,直至缓解或出现剂量限制毒性。我们使用交互式网络应答系统进行随机分组。使用外观与活性药物相似的安慰剂实现了盲法;研究医生、药剂师、监查员和患者在研究期间保持盲态,所有评估均由盲态评估员进行。初始方案未达到缓解的患者将从安慰剂转为使用活性药物;托珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤组的患者转为标准治疗(通常为联合肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂的甲氨蝶呤)。当达到持续缓解时,逐渐减少并停止使用甲氨蝶呤(和安慰剂-甲氨蝶呤),然后逐渐减少并停止使用托珠单抗(和安慰剂-托珠单抗)。主要终点是在初始方案和整个研究期间持续缓解(定义为 DAS28<2.6,且肿胀关节数≤4,持续至少 24 周)的患者比例,采用双侧 Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel 检验比较各组间差异。分析基于意向治疗原则。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01034137。

发现

2010 年 1 月 13 日至 2012 年 7 月 30 日期间,我们共招募并分配了 317 名符合条件的患者接受治疗(托珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤组 106 例,托珠单抗组 103 例,甲氨蝶呤组 108 例)。三组中完成研究的患者比例相似(72-78%)。最常见的退出原因是不良事件或并发疾病:27 例(34%)退出,其次是治疗应答不足:26 例(33%)退出。托珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤组有 91 例(86%)患者在初始方案中达到持续缓解,托珠单抗组有 86 例(84%),甲氨蝶呤组有 48 例(44%)(托珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤组相对于甲氨蝶呤组的相对风险[RR]为 2.00,95%CI 为 1.59-2.51,托珠单抗组相对于甲氨蝶呤组的 RR 为 1.86,95%CI 为 1.48-2.32,两者均<0.0001)。在整个研究期间,托珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤组有 91 例(86%)、托珠单抗组有 91 例(88%)和甲氨蝶呤组有 83 例(77%)患者达到持续缓解(托珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤组相对于甲氨蝶呤组的 RR 为 1.13,95%CI 为 1.00-1.29,p=0.06;托珠单抗组相对于甲氨蝶呤组的 RR 为 1.14,95%CI 为 1.01-1.29,p=0.0356;托珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤组相对于托珠单抗组的 RR 为 1.14,95%CI 为 1.01-1.29,p=0.0356)。托珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤组、托珠单抗组和甲氨蝶呤组最常见的不良事件均为鼻咽炎,分别有 38 例(36%)、40 例(39%)和 37 例(34%)。各组治疗相关不良事件的发生率无差异(托珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤组 17 例[16%],托珠单抗组 19 例[18%],甲氨蝶呤组 13 例[12%]),研究期间无死亡事件发生。

解释

对于新诊断为类风湿关节炎的患者,通过立即开始托珠单抗联合或不联合甲氨蝶呤以达到持续缓解的策略在疗效方面优于按照当前标准开始使用甲氨蝶呤,且安全性相当。

资助

罗氏诊断产品(上海)有限公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验