• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日语中声学嗓音质量指数的验证

Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.

作者信息

Hosokawa Kiyohito, Barsties Ben, Iwahashi Toshihiko, Iwahashi Mio, Kato Chieri, Iwaki Shinobu, Sasai Hisanori, Miyauchi Akira, Matsushiro Naoki, Inohara Hidenori, Ogawa Makoto, Maryn Youri

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Medical School, Hochschule Fresenius University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):260.e1-260.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.010
PMID:27287930
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) is a multivariate construct for quantification of overall voice quality based on the analysis of continuous speech and sustained vowel. The stability and validity of the AVQI is well established in several language families. However, the Japanese language has distinct characteristics with respect to several parameters of articulatory and phonatory physiology. The aim of the study was to confirm the criterion-related concurrent validity of AVQI, as well as its responsiveness to change and diagnostic accuracy for voice assessment in the Japanese-speaking population.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

METHODS

A total of 336 voice recordings, which included 69 pairs of voice recordings (before and after therapeutic interventions), were eligible for the study. The auditory-perceptual judgment of overall voice quality was evaluated by five experienced raters. The concurrent validity, responsiveness to change, and diagnostic accuracy of the AVQI were estimated.

RESULTS

The concurrent validity and responsiveness to change based on the overall voice quality was indicated by high correlation coefficients 0.828 and 0.767, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an excellent diagnostic accuracy for discrimination between dysphonic and normophonic voices (area under the curve: 0.905). The best threshold level for the AVQI of 3.15 corresponded with a sensitivity of 72.5% and specificity of 95.2%, with the positive and negative likelihood ratios of 15.1 and 0.29, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the validity of the AVQI as a tool for assessment of overall voice quality and that of voice therapy outcomes in the Japanese-speaking population.

摘要

目的

声学嗓音质量指数(AVQI)是一种基于连续语音和持续元音分析来量化整体嗓音质量的多变量指标。AVQI的稳定性和有效性在多个语系中已得到充分确立。然而,日语在发音和发声生理学的几个参数方面具有独特特征。本研究的目的是确认AVQI与标准相关的同时效度,以及其在说日语人群中对嗓音变化的反应性和嗓音评估的诊断准确性。

研究设计

这是一项回顾性研究。

方法

共有336份嗓音录音符合研究条件,其中包括69对(治疗干预前后)嗓音录音。由五名经验丰富的评估者对整体嗓音质量进行听觉感知判断。评估了AVQI的同时效度、对变化的反应性和诊断准确性。

结果

基于整体嗓音质量的同时效度和对变化的反应性分别由高相关系数0.828和0.767表明。受试者工作特征分析显示,在区分嗓音障碍和正常嗓音方面具有出色的诊断准确性(曲线下面积:0.905)。AVQI的最佳阈值水平为3.15,对应灵敏度为72.5%,特异度为95.2%,阳性似然比和阴性似然比分别为15.1和0.29。

结论

我们证明了AVQI作为评估说日语人群整体嗓音质量和嗓音治疗效果工具的有效性。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.日语中声学嗓音质量指数的验证
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):260.e1-260.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
2
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.立陶宛语声学语音质量指数的验证。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):257.e1-257.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
3
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.验证法语版声学语音质量指数 03.01。
J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):646.e11-646.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
4
Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.运用声学嗓音质量指数对儿童嗓音障碍进行客观评估。
J Voice. 2012 Sep;26(5):672.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 May 25.
5
Exploring The Validity of Acoustic Measurements and Other Voice Assessments.探索声学测量和其他语音评估的有效性。
J Voice. 2024 May;38(3):567-571. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.12.014. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population.芬兰语人群中的声学语音质量指数第 02.02 版。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2020 Jul;45(2):49-56. doi: 10.1080/14015439.2018.1556332. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
7
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language.韩语嗓音障碍指数量表的验证。
J Voice. 2019 Nov;33(6):948.e1-948.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
8
Comparison and Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 2 and Version 3 among South Indian Population.比较和验证印度南部人群的嗓音障碍指数量表 2 版和 3 版。
J Voice. 2024 Sep;38(5):1248.e1-1248.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.02.019. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
9
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language.《嗓音声学质量指数量表(03.01 版)》的巴西葡萄牙语验证。
J Voice. 2021 Jan;35(1):160.e15-160.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.024. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
10
Screening for Voice Disorders in Older Adults (RAVI)-Part III: Cutoff Score and Clinical Consistency.老年人嗓音障碍筛查(RAVI)-第三部分:截断分数与临床一致性
J Voice. 2017 Jan;31(1):117.e17-117.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
The Rapidly Evolving Scenario of Acoustic Voice Analysis in Otolaryngology.耳鼻咽喉科中快速发展的嗓音声学分析情况
Cureus. 2024 Nov 11;16(11):e73491. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73491. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
A Preliminary Investigation of the Reliability of Acoustic Parameters of Voice through Smartphone Recordings in Individuals with Dysphonia.通过智能手机录音对嗓音障碍患者嗓音声学参数可靠性的初步调查。
Int J Telerehabil. 2023 Dec 12;15(2):e6572. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2023.6572. eCollection 2023.
3
Reliability of Universal-Platform-Based Application in AVQI Measurements Captured with Different Smartphones.
基于通用平台的应用程序在不同智能手机捕获的AVQI测量中的可靠性。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 18;12(12):4119. doi: 10.3390/jcm12124119.
4
Exploring the feasibility of the combination of acoustic voice quality index and glottal function index for voice pathology screening.探索声学嗓音质量指数与声门功能指数相结合用于嗓音病理学筛查的可行性。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jun;276(6):1737-1745. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05433-5. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
5
[Questionnaire for the assessment of the voice self-concept in a neurological practice : Applicability for the identification of patients with high consultation needs].[神经科实践中语音自我概念评估问卷:用于识别高咨询需求患者的适用性]
Nervenarzt. 2019 Jun;90(6):601-608. doi: 10.1007/s00115-018-0642-x.
6
A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.嗓音障碍严重程度指数与声学嗓音质量指数在区分正常嗓音和嗓音障碍嗓音方面的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;275(4):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4903-x. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
7
Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders.无论是否患有嗓音障碍,随着嗓音强度增加,声学微扰指标均有所改善。
J Voice. 2018 Mar;32(2):162-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 May 18.