• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《嗓音声学质量指数量表(03.01 版)》的巴西葡萄牙语验证。

Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language.

机构信息

Department of Communication Disorders, UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; CEV - Centro de Estudos da Voz, São Paulo, Brazil.

SRH University of Applied Health Sciences, Düsseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

J Voice. 2021 Jan;35(1):160.e15-160.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.024. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.024
PMID:31474432
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Multiparametric indexes provide a more robust acoustic analysis of voice quality considering more than one acoustic parameter in the evaluation of sustained phonation and continuous speech. However, once the continuous speech is considered, differences among languages must be addressed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the concurrent validity and the diagnostic accuracy of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index version 03.01 (AVQI 03.01) in the Brazilian Portuguese.

METHOD

The counting numbers 1-20 and the vowel /a/ of 150 subjects were used (37 nondysphonic; 113 with dysphonia). To reach higher precision of the AVQI, the length of the voiced parts of the continuous speech and the sustained vowel were equalized. Nine voice specialists performed the perceptual auditory judgment of the samples. However, only five listeners were chosen for further analysis based on their moderate to substantial intrarater reliability (Cohen's Kappa: 0.605-0.773) and their reasonable inter-rater reliability (Fleiss Kappa: 0.429). The index concurrent validity and diagnosis accuracy were analyzed with the Spearman correlation and the receiver-operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

The AVQI 03.01 concurrent validity was high (r = 0.716). The coefficient of determination demonstrated that 51% of the vocal deviation can be explained by the acoustic analysis (r = 0.512). The diagnostic accuracy was excellent (90.4%). At a threshold of 1.33, the AVQI sensitivity and specificity were 78.8% and 90.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The AVQI is a valid tool in the Brazilian Portuguese language. It can be used as a screening tool, for clinical follow-up and evaluation pre- and post-treatment/procedures. Voice specialist should be aware of false-negative and false-positive results of the AVQI, especially for screening purposes.

摘要

简介

多参数指标在评估持续发声和连续言语时考虑了多个声学参数,从而提供了更稳健的语音质量声学分析。然而,一旦考虑到连续言语,就必须解决语言之间的差异。

目的

评估 Acoustic Voice Quality Index 版本 03.01(AVQI 03.01)在巴西葡萄牙语中的同时效度和诊断准确性。

方法

使用了 150 名受试者的数字 1-20 和元音/a/(37 名非发音障碍者;113 名发音障碍者)。为了提高 AVQI 的精度,连续言语和持续元音的浊音部分的长度进行了均衡。9 名语音专家对样本进行了感知听觉判断。然而,只有 5 名听众被选中进行进一步分析,因为他们具有中等至较大的组内可靠性(Cohen's Kappa:0.605-0.773)和合理的组间可靠性(Fleiss Kappa:0.429)。使用 Spearman 相关系数和受试者工作特征曲线分析了指数的同时效度和诊断准确性。

结果

AVQI 03.01 的同时效度较高(r=0.716)。决定系数表明,声学分析可以解释 51%的声音偏差(r=0.512)。诊断准确性很高(90.4%)。在阈值为 1.33 时,AVQI 的敏感性和特异性分别为 78.8%和 90.6%。

结论

AVQI 是一种在巴西葡萄牙语中有效的工具。它可以用作筛查工具,用于临床随访和评估治疗/程序前后。语音专家应该注意 AVQI 的假阴性和假阳性结果,特别是在筛查目的方面。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language.《嗓音声学质量指数量表(03.01 版)》的巴西葡萄牙语验证。
J Voice. 2021 Jan;35(1):160.e15-160.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.024. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
2
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.验证法语版声学语音质量指数 03.01。
J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):646.e11-646.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
3
Validation of the acoustic breathiness index to the Brazilian Portuguese language.声学呼吸音指数在巴西葡萄牙语中的验证。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2022 Apr;47(1):56-62. doi: 10.1080/14015439.2020.1864467. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
4
Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Acoustic Breathiness Index: Analysis With Different Speech Material in the Brazilian Portuguese.声学嗓音质量指数和声学呼吸音指数:巴西葡萄牙语不同语音材料的分析
J Voice. 2020 Sep;34(5):810.e11-810.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
5
Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.验证韩国人群中的嗓音障碍指数 3.01 版和声扰指数。
J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):660.e9-660.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
6
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.立陶宛语声学语音质量指数的验证。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):257.e1-257.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
7
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in German.德语版声学嗓音质量指数 03.01 版和声学粗糙声指数的验证。
J Voice. 2020 Jan;34(1):157.e17-157.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.026. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
8
The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population.芬兰语人群中的声学语音质量指数第 02.02 版。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2020 Jul;45(2):49-56. doi: 10.1080/14015439.2018.1556332. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
9
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.日语中声学嗓音质量指数的验证
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):260.e1-260.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
10
Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language.基于 Kannada 语的嗓音障碍严重度感知等级,声学嗓音质量分析 02.03 版的诊断准确性。
J Voice. 2021 Jan;35(1):159.e11-159.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The Rapidly Evolving Scenario of Acoustic Voice Analysis in Otolaryngology.耳鼻咽喉科中快速发展的嗓音声学分析情况
Cureus. 2024 Nov 11;16(11):e73491. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73491. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed - CPPS and Acoustic Voice Quality Index - AVQI in healthy and altered children's voices: comparation, relationship with auditory-perceptual judgment and cut-off points.声道倒谱峰值平滑度 - CPPS 和嗓音声学质量指数 - AVQI 在健康和异常儿童嗓音中的比较:与听觉感知判断的关系和截断值。
Codas. 2024 May 27;36(4):e20230047. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242023047pt. eCollection 2024.
3
Immediate effect of inspiratory exercise with exerciser and respiratory encourager in women without vocal complaints.
无发声抱怨女性使用呼吸训练器和呼吸激励器进行吸气练习的即时效果。
Codas. 2024 May 20;36(4):e20230148. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20242023148pt. eCollection 2024.
4
Acoustic measurements of CPPS and AVQI pre and post speech therapy.CPPS 和 AVQI 的声学测量,治疗前后的言语治疗。
Codas. 2023 Sep 1;35(6):e20220136. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022136pt. eCollection 2023.
5
Videokymographic index of glottic function: an analysis of diagnostic accuracy.声门运动录像指数:诊断准确性分析。
Codas. 2022 Oct 17;35(1):e20210214. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021214pt. eCollection 2022.
6
Reducing the GAP between science and clinic: lessons from academia and professional practice - part A: perceptual-auditory judgment of vocal quality, acoustic vocal signal analysis and voice self-assessment.缩小科学与临床之间的差距:学术和专业实践的经验教训 - 第 A 部分:声音质量的知觉 - 听觉判断、声学嗓音信号分析和嗓音自我评估。
Codas. 2022 Aug 1;34(5):e20210240. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212021240pt. eCollection 2022.
7
GALP Qualifier Scale: Initial Considerations to Classify a Voice Problem.GALP 定性评估量表:嗓音问题分类的初步考虑。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2020;72(5):402-410. doi: 10.1159/000502772. Epub 2019 Oct 1.