Graham David F, Modenese Luca, Trewartha Grant, Carty Christopher P, Constantinou Maria, Lloyd David G, Barrett Rod S
School of Allied Health Sciences and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia; School of Science and Technology, University New England, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Allied Health Sciences and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia; Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, UK; INSIGNEO Institute for in silico medicine, The University of Sheffield, UK.
J Biomech. 2016 Sep 6;49(13):2619-2624. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.05.033. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
Hip joint contact loads during activities of daily living are not generally considered high enough to cause acute bone or joint injury. However there is some evidence that hip joint loads may be higher in stumble recovery from loss of balance. A common laboratory method used to evaluate balance recovery performance involves suddenly releasing participants from various static forward lean magnitudes (perturbation intensities). Prior studies have shown that when released from the same perturbation intensity, some older adults are able to recover with a single step, whereas others require multiple steps. The main purpose of this study was to use a musculoskeletal model to determine the effect of three balance perturbation intensities and the use of single versus multiple recovery steps on hip joint contact loads during recovery from forward loss of balance in community dwelling older adults (n=76). We also evaluated the association of peak hip contact loads with perturbation intensity, step length and trunk flexion angle at foot contact at each participant׳s maximum recoverable lean angle (MRLA). Peak hip joint contact loads were computed using muscle force estimates obtained using Static Optimisation and increased as lean magnitude was increased and were on average 32% higher for Single Steppers compared to Multiple Steppers. At the MRLA, peak hip contact loads ranged from 4.3 to 12.7 body weights and multiple linear stepwise regression further revealed that initial lean angle, step length and trunk angle at foot contact together explained 27% of the total variance in hip joint contact load. Overall findings indicated that older adults experience peak hip joint contact loads during maximal balance recovery by stepping that in some cases exceeded loads reported to cause mechanical failure of cadaver femurs. While step length and trunk flexion angle are strong predictors of step recovery performance they are at best moderate predictors of peak hip joint loading.
在日常生活活动中,髋关节接触负荷一般被认为不够高,不足以导致急性骨或关节损伤。然而,有一些证据表明,在从平衡丧失中恢复绊倒时,髋关节负荷可能更高。一种用于评估平衡恢复表现的常见实验室方法是突然让参与者从不同的静态前倾幅度(扰动强度)中释放。先前的研究表明,当从相同的扰动强度释放时,一些老年人能够一步恢复,而另一些人则需要多步。本研究的主要目的是使用肌肉骨骼模型来确定三种平衡扰动强度以及单步与多步恢复对社区居住的老年人(n = 76)从向前平衡丧失中恢复期间髋关节接触负荷的影响。我们还评估了在每个参与者的最大可恢复倾斜角度(MRLA)下,髋关节峰值接触负荷与扰动强度、步长和足部接触时的躯干屈曲角度之间的关联。使用静态优化获得的肌肉力量估计值计算髋关节峰值接触负荷,随着倾斜幅度的增加而增加,单步恢复者的平均负荷比多步恢复者高32%。在MRLA时,髋关节峰值接触负荷范围为4.3至12.7倍体重,多元线性逐步回归进一步显示,初始倾斜角度、步长和足部接触时的躯干角度共同解释了髋关节接触负荷总方差的27%。总体研究结果表明,老年人在通过迈步进行最大平衡恢复期间会经历髋关节峰值接触负荷,在某些情况下超过了据报道会导致尸体股骨机械失效的负荷。虽然步长和躯干屈曲角度是步恢复表现的强预测指标,但它们充其量只是髋关节峰值负荷的中等预测指标。