Glied Sherry, Striar Adam
Robert F. Wagner School of Public Service, New York University, USA.
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016 Jun;15:1-12.
One effect of the Affordable Care Act's "Cadillac tax" (now delayed until 2020) is to undo part of the existing federal tax preference for employer-sponsored insurance. The specific features of this tax on high-cost health plans--notably, the inclusion of tax-favored savings vehicles such as health savings accounts (HSAs) in the formula for determining who is subject to the tax--are designed primarily to maximize revenue and minimize coverage disruptions, not to reduce health spending. Thus, at least initially, these savings accounts, rather than enrollee cost-sharing or other plan features, are likely to be affected most by the tax as employers act to limit their HSA contributions. Because high earners are the ones benefiting most from tax-preferred accounts, the high-cost plan tax will probably be more progressive than prior analyses have suggested, while having only a modest impact on total health spending.
《平价医疗法案》中的“凯迪拉克税”(现已推迟至2020年)的一个影响是,取消了现有联邦政府对雇主提供保险的税收优惠的一部分。这种对高成本健康计划征税的具体特征——特别是在确定谁应纳税的公式中纳入了诸如健康储蓄账户(HSAs)等税收优惠储蓄工具——主要是为了实现收入最大化和覆盖中断最小化,而非减少医疗支出。因此,至少在最初阶段,随着雇主采取行动限制其对健康储蓄账户的供款,这些储蓄账户而非参保人的成本分摊或其他计划特征可能会受到该税的最大影响。由于高收入者是从税收优惠账户中受益最多的群体,高成本计划税可能比之前的分析所显示的更具累进性,同时对医疗总支出的影响较小。