Suppr超能文献

“深度鼓泡”的压力有多大?

How Stressful Is "Deep Bubbling"?

作者信息

Tyrmi Jaana, Laukkanen Anne-Maria

机构信息

Speech and Voice Research Laboratory, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland..

Speech and Voice Research Laboratory, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):262.e1-262.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Water resistance therapy by phonating through a tube into the water is used to treat dysphonia. Deep submersion (≥10 cm in water, "deep bubbling") is used for hypofunctional voice disorders. Using it with caution is recommended to avoid vocal overloading. This experimental study aimed to investigate how strenuous "deep bubbling" is.

STUDY DESIGN

Fourteen subjects, half of them with voice training, repeated the syllable [pa:] in comfortable speaking pitch and loudness, loudly, and in strained voice. Thereafter, they phonated a vowel-like sound both in comfortable loudness and loudly into a glass resonance tube immersed 10 cm into the water.

METHODS

Oral pressure, contact quotient (CQ, calculated from electroglottographic signal), and sound pressure level were studied. The peak oral pressure P(oral) during [p] and shuttering of the outer end of the tube was measured to estimate the subglottic pressure P(sub) and the mean P(oral) during vowel portions to enable calculation of transglottic pressure P(trans). Sensations during phonation were reported with an open-ended interview.

RESULTS

P(sub) and P(oral) were higher in "deep bubbling" and P(trans) lower than in loud syllable phonation, but the CQ did not differ significantly. Similar results were obtained for the comparison between loud "deep bubbling" and strained phonation, although P(sub) did not differ significantly. Most of the subjects reported "deep bubbling" to be stressful only for respiratory and lip muscles. No big differences were found between trained and untrained subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

The CQ values suggest that "deep bubbling" may increase vocal fold loading. Further studies should address impact stress during water resistance exercises.

摘要

目的

通过将管子插入水中发声进行的水阻力疗法用于治疗发声障碍。深度浸入(水中≥10厘米,“深度冒泡”)用于嗓音功能减退性嗓音障碍。建议谨慎使用以避免嗓音负荷过重。本实验研究旨在调查“深度冒泡”的强度如何。

研究设计

14名受试者,其中一半接受过嗓音训练,他们以舒适的说话音高和响度、大声以及用紧张的嗓音重复音节[pa:]。此后,他们以舒适的响度和大声向浸入水中10厘米的玻璃共鸣管中发出类似元音的声音。

方法

研究口腔压力、接触商(CQ,由电声门图信号计算得出)和声压级。测量发[p]音时及管子外端关闭时的口腔压力峰值P(oral),以估计声门下压力P(sub),并测量元音部分的平均P(oral),以便计算声门跨压P(trans)。通过开放式访谈报告发声时的感觉。

结果

“深度冒泡”时的P(sub)和P(oral)较高,P(trans)低于大声发音节时,但CQ无显著差异。大声“深度冒泡”与紧张发声之间的比较也得到了类似结果,尽管P(sub)无显著差异。大多数受试者报告“深度冒泡”仅对呼吸和唇部肌肉有压力。训练有素和未受过训练的受试者之间未发现太大差异。

结论

CQ值表明“深度冒泡”可能会增加声带负荷。进一步的研究应关注水阻力训练期间的冲击压力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验