Granqvist Svante, Simberg Susanna, Hertegård Stellan, Holmqvist Sofia, Larsson Hans, Lindestad Per-Åke, Södersten Maria, Hammarberg Britta
a Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Clinical Science , Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet (KI) , Stockholm , Sweden.
b Basic Science and Biomedicine, School of Technology and Health (STH), Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) , Stockholm , Sweden.
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2015 Oct;40(3):113-21. doi: 10.3109/14015439.2014.913682. Epub 2014 May 28.
Phonation into glass tubes ('resonance tubes'), keeping the free end of the tube in water, has been a frequently used voice therapy method in Finland and more recently also in other countries. The purpose of this exploratory study was to investigate what effects tube phonation with and without water has on the larynx. Two participants were included in the study. The methods used were high-speed imaging, electroglottographic observations of vocal fold vibrations, and measurements of oral pressure during tube phonation. Results showed that the fluctuation in the back pressure during tube phonation in water altered the vocal fold vibrations. In the high-speed imaging, effects were found in the open quotient and amplitude variation of the glottal opening. The open quotient increased with increasing water depth (from 2 cm to 6 cm). A modulation effect by the water bubbles on the vocal fold vibrations was seen both in the high-speed glottal area tracings and in the electroglottography signal. A second experiment revealed that the increased average oral pressure was largely determined by the water depth. The increased open quotient can possibly be explained by an increased abduction of the vocal folds and/or a reduced transglottal pressure. The back pressure of the bubbles also modulates glottal vibrations with a possible 'massage' effect on the vocal folds. This effect and the well-defined average pressure increase due to the known water depth are different from those of other methods using a semi-occluded vocal tract.
对着玻璃管(“共鸣管”)发声,将管子的自由端置于水中,这在芬兰一直是一种常用的嗓音治疗方法,最近在其他国家也开始使用。这项探索性研究的目的是调查有水和无水情况下的管中发声对喉部有何影响。该研究纳入了两名参与者。所使用的方法包括高速成像、声带振动的电声门图观察以及管中发声时口腔压力的测量。结果表明,水中管中发声时背压的波动改变了声带振动。在高速成像中,声门开口的开放商数和幅度变化出现了影响。开放商数随水深增加(从2厘米到6厘米)而增加。在高速声门区域描记图和电声门图信号中均可见水泡对声带振动的调制作用。第二个实验表明,平均口腔压力的增加在很大程度上取决于水深。开放商数的增加可能是由于声带外展增加和/或跨声门压力降低所致。水泡的背压也会调制声门振动,可能对声带产生“按摩”作用。这种作用以及因已知水深而明确的平均压力增加与其他使用半闭塞声道的方法不同。