Malhotra Rakesh
Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2016 Apr-Jun;19(2):175-82. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.182302.
Neurogenic inflammation, a well-defined pathophysiologial process is characterized by the release of potent vasoactive neuropeptides, predominantly calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P (SP), and neurokinin A from activated peripheral nociceptive sensory nerve terminals (usually C and A delta-fibers). These peptides lead to a cascade of inflammatory tissue responses including arteriolar vasodilation, plasma protein extravasation, and degranulation of mast cells in their peripheral target tissue. Neurogenic inflammatory processes have long been implicated as a possible mechanism involved in the pathophysiology of various human diseases of the nervous system, respiratory system, gastrointestinal tract, urogenital tract, and skin. The recent development of several innovative experimental migraine models has provided evidence suggestive of the involvement of neuropeptides (SP, neurokinin A, and CGRP) in migraine headache. Antidromic stimulation of nociceptive fibers of the trigeminal nerve resulted in a neurogenic inflammatory response with marked increase in plasma protein extravasation from dural blood vessels by the release of various sensory neuropeptides. Several clinically effective abortive antimigraine medications, such as ergots and triptans, have been shown to attenuate the release of neuropeptide and neurogenic plasma protein extravasation. These findings provide support for the validity of using animal models to investigate mechanisms of neurogenic inflammation in migraine. These also further strengthen the notion of migraine being a neuroinflammatory disease. In the clinical context, there is a paucity of knowledge and awareness among physicians regarding the role of neurogenic inflammation in migraine. Improved understanding of the molecular biology, pharmacology, and pathophysiology of neurogenic inflammation may provide the practitioner the context-specific feedback to identify the novel and most effective therapeutic approach to treatment. With this objective, the present review summarizes the evidence supporting the involvement of neurogenic inflammation and neuropeptides in the pathophysiology and pharmacology of migraine headache as well as its potential significance in better tailoring therapeutic interventions in migraine or other neurological disorders. In addition, we have briefly highlighted the pathophysiological role of neurogenic inflammation in various other neurological disorders.
神经源性炎症是一个明确的病理生理过程,其特征是从激活的外周伤害性感觉神经末梢(通常是C纤维和Aδ纤维)释放强效血管活性神经肽,主要是降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)、P物质(SP)和神经激肽A。这些肽引发一系列炎症组织反应,包括小动脉血管舒张、血浆蛋白外渗以及外周靶组织中肥大细胞的脱颗粒。长期以来,神经源性炎症过程一直被认为是参与神经系统、呼吸系统、胃肠道、泌尿生殖道和皮肤等各种人类疾病病理生理的一种可能机制。几种创新性实验性偏头痛模型的最新进展提供了证据,表明神经肽(SP、神经激肽A和CGRP)参与偏头痛性头痛。三叉神经伤害性纤维的逆向刺激导致神经源性炎症反应,通过释放各种感觉神经肽,硬脑膜血管的血浆蛋白外渗显著增加。几种临床有效的偏头痛缓解药物,如麦角生物碱和曲坦类药物,已被证明可减少神经肽释放和神经源性血浆蛋白外渗。这些发现为使用动物模型研究偏头痛中神经源性炎症机制的有效性提供了支持。这些发现还进一步强化了偏头痛是一种神经炎症性疾病的观念。在临床方面,医生对神经源性炎症在偏头痛中的作用缺乏了解和认识。更好地理解神经源性炎症的分子生物学、药理学和病理生理学,可能为从业者提供特定背景下的反馈,以确定新颖且最有效的治疗方法。出于这一目的,本综述总结了支持神经源性炎症和神经肽参与偏头痛性头痛病理生理和药理学的证据,以及其在更好地定制偏头痛或其他神经系统疾病治疗干预措施方面的潜在意义。此外,我们还简要强调了神经源性炎症在各种其他神经系统疾病中的病理生理作用。