Linde Mattias, Mulleners Wim M, Chronicle Edward P, McCrory Douglas C
Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 24;2013(6):CD010611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010611.
Some antiepileptic drugs but not others are useful in clinical practice for the prophylaxis of migraine. This might be explained by the variety of actions of these drugs in the central nervous system. The present review is part of an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004, and previously updated (conclusions not changed) in 2007.
To describe and assess the evidence from controlled trials on the efficacy and tolerability of valproate (valproic acid or sodium valproate or a combination of the two) for preventing migraine attacks in adult patients with episodic migraine.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 12), PubMed/MEDLINE (1966 to 15 January 2013), MEDLINE In-Process (current week, 15 January 2013), and EMBASE (1974 to 15 January 2013) and handsearched Headache and Cephalalgia through January 2013.
Studies were required to be prospective, controlled trials of valproate taken regularly to prevent the occurrence of migraine attacks, to improve migraine-related quality of life, or both.
Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. For headache frequency data, we calculated mean differences (MDs) between valproate and comparator (placebo, active control, or valproate in a different dose) for individual studies and pooled these across studies. For dichotomous data on responders (patients with ≥ 50% reduction in headache frequency), we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and, in select cases, risk ratios (RRs); we also calculated numbers needed to treat (NNTs). We calculated MDs for Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores. We also summarised data on adverse events from placebo-controlled trials and calculated risk differences (RDs) and numbers needed to harm (NNHs).
Ten papers describing 10 unique trials met the inclusion criteria. Analysis of data from two trials (63 participants) showed that sodium valproate reduced headache frequency by approximately four headaches per 28 days as compared to placebo (MD -4.31; 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.32 to -0.30). Data from four trials (542 participants) showed that divalproex sodium (a stable combination of sodium valproate and valproic acid in a 1:1 molar ratio) more than doubled the proportion of responders relative to placebo (RR 2.18; 95% CI 1.28 to 3.72; NNT 4; 95% CI 2 to 11). One study of sodium valproate (34 participants) versus placebo supported the latter findings (RR for responders 2.83; 95% CI 1.27 to 6.31; NNT 3; 95% CI 2 to 9). There was no significant difference in the proportion of responders between sodium valproate versus flunarizine (one trial, 41 participants) or between divalproex sodium versus propranolol (one trial, 32 participants). Pooled analysis of post-treatment mean headache frequencies in two trials (88 participants) demonstrates a slight but significant advantage for topiramate 50 mg over valproate 400 mg (MD -0.90; 95% CI -1.58 to -0.22). For placebo-controlled trials of sodium valproate and divalproex sodium, NNHs for clinically important adverse events ranged from 7 to 14.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Valproate is effective in reducing headache frequency and is reasonably well tolerated in adult patients with episodic migraine.
在临床实践中,某些抗癫痫药物可用于预防偏头痛,而其他药物则不然。这可能是由于这些药物在中枢神经系统中的多种作用所致。本综述是Cochrane综述更新的一部分,该综述于2004年首次发表,并于2007年进行了更新(结论未变)。
描述并评估来自对照试验的证据,以证明丙戊酸盐(丙戊酸或丙戊酸钠或两者的组合)对预防发作性偏头痛成年患者偏头痛发作的疗效和耐受性。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL;《Cochrane图书馆》2012年第12期)、PubMed/MEDLINE(1966年至2013年1月15日)、MEDLINE在研数据库(当前周,2013年1月15日)和EMBASE(1974年至2013年1月15日),并手动检索了截至2013年1月的《头痛与头面痛》。
研究必须是前瞻性对照试验,定期服用丙戊酸盐以预防偏头痛发作的发生、改善与偏头痛相关的生活质量或两者兼具。
两位综述作者独立选择研究并提取数据。对于头痛频率数据,我们计算了各研究中丙戊酸盐与对照(安慰剂、活性对照或不同剂量的丙戊酸盐)之间的平均差(MDs),并将这些数据合并。对于反应者(头痛频率降低≥50%的患者)的二分数据,我们计算了比值比(ORs),并在某些情况下计算了风险比(RRs);我们还计算了治疗所需人数(NNTs)。我们计算了偏头痛残疾评估(MIDAS)评分的MDs。我们还总结了安慰剂对照试验中不良事件的数据,并计算了风险差(RDs)和伤害所需人数(NNHs)。
十篇描述十项独特试验的论文符合纳入标准。两项试验(63名参与者)的数据分析表明,与安慰剂相比,丙戊酸钠可使头痛频率每28天减少约四次(MD -4.31;95%置信区间(CI)-8.32至-0.30)。四项试验(542名参与者)的数据表明,丙戊酸二钠(丙戊酸钠和丙戊酸以1:1摩尔比的稳定组合)相对于安慰剂使反应者比例增加了一倍多(RR 2.18;95% CI 1.28至3.72;NNT 4;95% CI 2至11)。一项丙戊酸钠与安慰剂对比的研究(34名参与者)支持了后者的结果(反应者RR 2.83;95% CI 1.27至6.31;NNT 3;95% CI 2至9)。丙戊酸钠与氟桂利嗪对比(一项试验,41名参与者)或丙戊酸二钠与普萘洛尔对比(一项试验,32名参与者)之间,反应者比例无显著差异。两项试验(88名参与者)治疗后平均头痛频率的汇总分析表明,50毫克托吡酯比400毫克丙戊酸盐有轻微但显著的优势(MD -0.90;95% CI -1.58至-0.22)。对于丙戊酸钠和丙戊酸二钠的安慰剂对照试验,具有临床重要意义的不良事件的NNHs范围为7至14。
丙戊酸盐可有效降低头痛频率,且发作性偏头痛成年患者对其耐受性较好。