Velez-Cubian Frank O, Zhang Wei-Wei, Rodriguez Kathryn L, Thau Matthew R, Ng Emily P, Moodie Carla C, Garrett Joseph R, Fontaine Jacques-Pierre, Toloza Eric M
1 Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA ; 2 Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA ; 3 Department of Thoracic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA ; 4 Department of Oncologic Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jun;8(6):1245-9. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.04.67.
Patients with smaller body surface area (BSA) have smaller pleural cavities, which limit visualization and instrument mobility during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). We investigated the effects of BSA on outcomes with robotic-assisted VATS lobectomy.
We analyzed 208 consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted lobectomy over 34 months. Patients were separated into group A (BSA ≤1.65 m(2)) and group B (BSA >1.65 m(2)). Operative times, estimated blood loss (EBL), conversions to thoracotomy, complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality were compared.
Group A had 40 patients (BSA 1.25-1.65 m(2)), and group B had 168 patients (BSA 1.66-2.86 m(2)). Median skin-to-skin operative times [± standard error of the mean (SEM)] were 169±16 min for group A and 176±6 min for group B (P=0.34). Group A had median EBL of 150±96 mL compared to 200±24 mL for group B (P=0.37). Overall conversion rate to thoracotomy was 8/40 (20.0%) in group A versus 12/168 (7.1%) in group B (P=0.03); while emergent conversion for bleeding was 2/40 (5.0%) in group A versus 5/168 (3.0%) in group B (P=0.62). Postoperative complications occurred in 12/40 (30.0%) in group A, compared to 66/168 (39.3%) in group B (P=0.28). Patients from both groups had median hospital LOS of 5 days (P=0.68) and had similar in-hospital mortality.
Patients with BSA ≤1.65 m(2) have similar perioperative outcomes and complication risks as patients with larger BSA. Patients with BSA ≤1.65 m(2) have a higher overall conversion rate to thoracotomy, but similar conversion rate for bleeding as patients with larger BSA. Robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy is feasible and safe in patients with small body habitus.
体表面积(BSA)较小的患者胸膜腔较小,这限制了电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)期间的视野及器械活动度。我们研究了BSA对机器人辅助VATS肺叶切除术预后的影响。
我们分析了在34个月内连续接受机器人辅助肺叶切除术的208例患者。患者被分为A组(BSA≤1.65 m²)和B组(BSA>1.65 m²)。比较手术时间、估计失血量(EBL)、中转开胸率、并发症、住院时间(LOS)及院内死亡率。
A组有40例患者(BSA 1.25 - 1.65 m²),B组有1例患者(BSA 1.66 - 2.86 m²)。A组皮肤到皮肤的中位手术时间[±平均标准误差(SEM)]为169±16分钟,B组为176±6分钟(P = 0.34)。A组的中位EBL为150±96 mL,B组为200±24 mL(P = 0.37)。A组总的中转开胸率为8/40(20.0%),B组为12/168(7.1%)(P = 0.03);而因出血急诊中转开胸率A组为2/40(5.0%),B组为5/168(3.0%)(P = 0.62)。A组术后并发症发生率为12/40(30.0%),B组为66/168(39.3%)(P = 0.28)。两组患者的中位住院LOS均为5天(P = 0.68),院内死亡率相似。
BSA≤1.65 m²的患者与BSA较大的患者围手术期预后及并发症风险相似。BSA≤1.65 m²的患者总的中转开胸率较高,但因出血的中转开胸率与BSA较大的患者相似。机器人辅助肺叶切除术在小体型患者中是可行且安全的。