Kwon Jin-Won, Park Hae-Young, Kim Ye Jee, Moon Seong-Hwan, Kang Hye-Young
College of Pharmacy and Research, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
College of Pharmacy, Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
J Bone Metab. 2016 May;23(2):63-77. doi: 10.11005/jbm.2016.23.2.63. Epub 2016 May 31.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of drug therapy to prevent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia in Korea.
A Markov cohort simulation was conducted for lifetime with a hypothetical cohort of postmenopausal women with osteopenia and without prior fractures. They were assumed to receive calcium/vitamin D supplements only or drug therapy (i.e., raloxifene or risedronate) along with calcium/vitamin D for 5 years. The Markov model includes fracture-specific and non-fracture specific health states (i.e. breast cancer and venous thromboembolism), and all-cause death. Published literature was used to determine the model parameters. Local data were used to estimate the baseline incidence rates of fracture in those with osteopenia and the costs associated with each health state.
From a societal perspective, the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for the base cases that had T-scores between -2.0 and -2.4 and began drug therapy at the age of 55, 60, or 65 years were $16,472, $6,741, and -$13,982 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained, respectively. Sensitivity analyses for medication compliance, risk of death following vertebral fracture, and relaxing definition of osteopenia resulted in ICERs reached to $24,227 per QALY gained.
ICERs for the base case and sensitivity analyses remained within the World Health Organization's willingness-to-pay threshold, which is less than per-capita gross domestic product in Korea (about $25,700). Thus, we conclude that drug therapy for osteopenia would be a cost-effective intervention, and we recommend that the Korean National Health Insurance expand its coverage to include drug therapy for osteopenia.
评估药物治疗预防韩国绝经后骨质减少女性骨质疏松性骨折的成本效益。
对一组假设的无既往骨折史的绝经后骨质减少女性进行终身马尔可夫队列模拟。她们被假定仅接受钙/维生素D补充剂,或接受药物治疗(即雷洛昔芬或利塞膦酸盐)并同时补充钙/维生素D,为期5年。马尔可夫模型包括骨折特异性和非骨折特异性健康状态(即乳腺癌和静脉血栓栓塞)以及全因死亡。使用已发表的文献来确定模型参数。使用本地数据估计骨质减少者骨折的基线发病率以及与每种健康状态相关的成本。
从社会角度来看,对于T值在-2.0至-2.4之间且在55岁、60岁或65岁开始药物治疗的基础病例,估计每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效益比(ICER)分别为16,472美元﹑6,741美元和-13,982美元。对药物依从性、椎体骨折后死亡风险以及放宽骨质减少定义的敏感性分析导致每获得一个QALY的ICER达到24,227美元。
基础病例和敏感性分析的ICER仍在世界卫生组织的支付意愿阈值之内,该阈值低于韩国的人均国内生产总值(约25,700美元)。因此,我们得出结论,骨质减少的药物治疗将是一种具有成本效益的干预措施,并且我们建议韩国国民健康保险扩大其覆盖范围,将骨质减少的药物治疗纳入其中。