• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The CMS Sepsis Mandate: Right Disease, Wrong Measure.

作者信息

Klompas Michael, Rhee Chanu

机构信息

From Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2016 Oct 4;165(7):517-518. doi: 10.7326/M16-0588. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

DOI:10.7326/M16-0588
PMID:27294338
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
The CMS Sepsis Mandate: Right Disease, Wrong Measure.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的脓毒症指令：疾病正确，措施错误。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Oct 4;165(7):517-518. doi: 10.7326/M16-0588. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
2
Preliminary Performance on the New CMS Sepsis-1 National Quality Measure: Early Insights From the Emergency Quality Network (E-QUAL).新型 CMS 脓毒症-1 国家质量指标的初步表现：来自急诊质量网络（E-QUAL）的早期见解。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;71(1):10-15.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.032. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
3
The Past, Present, and Future of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Quality Measure SEP-1: The Early Management Bundle for Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心质量指标SEP-1的过去、现在与未来：严重脓毒症/脓毒症休克的早期管理综合方案
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2017 Feb;35(1):219-231. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2016.09.006.
4
Success Against Sepsis.抗击脓毒症取得成功。
Trustee. 2016 Jan;69(1):17-20, 1.
5
SEP-1 Has Brought Much Needed Attention to Improving Sepsis Care…But Now Is the Time to Improve SEP-1.SEP-1已将急需的关注带到改善脓毒症护理方面……但现在是时候改进SEP-1了。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;48(6):779-782. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004305.
6
National Performance on the Medicare SEP-1 Sepsis Quality Measure.国家在 Medicare SEP-1 脓毒症质量测量上的表现。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;47(8):1026-1032. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003613.
7
Modify Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Sepsis Core Measure (SEP-1) Now to Optimize Care for COVID-19.修改医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的脓毒症核心指标（SEP-1），以优化 COVID-19 护理。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jun;174(6):860-861. doi: 10.7326/M20-8266. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
8
Nurse Influence in Meeting Compliance With the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Quality Measure: Early Management Bundle, Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock (SEP-1).护士在促使符合医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心质量指标方面的影响：早期管理综合方案，严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克（SEP-1）
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;38(2):70-82. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000340.
9
Sepsis Definitions: The Search for Gold and What CMS Got Wrong.脓毒症的定义：探寻黄金标准以及医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的错误之处
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;18(5):951-956. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.4.32795. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
10
Inter-rater Agreement for Abstraction of the Early Management Bundle, Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock (SEP-1) Quality Measure in a Multi-Hospital Health System.多医院卫生系统中早期管理集束化、严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克（SEP-1）质量指标提取的评分者间一致性
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019 Feb;45(2):108-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Sepsis Outcomes in the Era of Pay-for-Performance and Electronic Quality Measures: A Joint IDSA/ACEP/PIDS/SHEA/SHM/SIDP Position Paper.在按绩效付费和电子质量措施时代提高脓毒症治疗效果：IDSA/ACEP/PIDS/SHEA/SHM/SIDP 联合立场文件。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Mar 20;78(3):505-513. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad447.
2
Sepsis mortality and ICU length of stay after the implementation of an intensive care team in the emergency department.在急诊科实施重症监护团队后，脓毒症的死亡率和 ICU 住院时间。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;18(6):1789-1796. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03265-0. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
3
A modified Delphi approach to develop a trial protocol for antibiotic de-escalation in patients with suspected sepsis.
一种改良的德尔菲法，用于制定疑似脓毒症患者抗生素降阶梯治疗的试验方案。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2021 Nov 8;1(1):e44. doi: 10.1017/ash.2021.205. eCollection 2021.
4
Temporal Trends in Antimicrobial Prescribing During Hospitalization for Potential Infection and Sepsis.潜在感染和脓毒症患者住院期间抗菌药物应用的时间趋势。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Aug 1;182(8):805-813. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2291.
5
Implementation approaches and barriers for rule-based and machine learning-based sepsis risk prediction tools: a qualitative study.基于规则和基于机器学习的脓毒症风险预测工具的实施方法与障碍：一项定性研究
JAMIA Open. 2022 Apr 18;5(2):ooac022. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac022. eCollection 2022 Jul.
6
Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理捆绑包实施与美国医院疑似脓毒症患者结局的相关性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138596. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38596.
7
Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes After the Introduction of the Medicare Sepsis Performance Measure (SEP-1).在引入医疗保险脓毒症表现测量（SEP-1）后，治疗模式和临床结果。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jul;174(7):927-935. doi: 10.7326/M20-5043. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
8
Early Detection of Septic Shock Onset Using Interpretable Machine Learners.使用可解释机器学习算法早期检测脓毒症休克发作
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 15;10(2):301. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020301.
9
Impact of Risk Adjustment Using Clinical vs Administrative Data on Hospital Sepsis Mortality Comparisons.使用临床数据与管理数据进行风险调整对医院脓毒症死亡率比较的影响。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 25;7(6):ofaa213. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa213. eCollection 2020 Jun.
10
Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens in Culture-Proven Sepsis and Outcomes Associated With Inadequate and Broad-Spectrum Empiric Antibiotic Use.培养证实的脓毒症中抗生素耐药病原体的流行情况以及与经验性抗生素使用不足和广谱相关的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202899. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2899.