Rote Wendy M, Smetana Judith G
Department of Psychology, University of South Florida St. Petersburg, 140 7th Ave. S. Davis 114, St. Petersburg, FL, 33701, USA.
Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester, Meliora Hall, RC 270266, Rochester, NY, 14627, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Oct;45(10):2064-79. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0515-1. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
Parent-child discrepancies pervade the family literature; they appear in reports of relationship dynamics (e.g., conflict; Laursen et al. 1998), parent and child behaviors (e.g., monitoring; De Los Reyes et al. 2010), and individual family members' beliefs (e.g., parental legitimate authority; Smetana 2011). Discrepancies are developmentally normative (Steinberg 2001) but also may be indicators of relationship and adjustment problems for teens (Ohannessian 2012). Because of this variation, it is important to consider the extent to which parent-child discrepancies are a function of both the dyad and the family construct considered. The present study contributed to our understanding of informant discrepancies in family relationships by considering the patterning, consistency, and correlates of mother-adolescent discrepancies across three family constructs that vary in their objectivity. Using person-centered analyses, discrepancies in adolescents' and mothers' ratings of parents' right to know about teens' activities, mothers' knowledge of them, and positive mother-adolescents relationships were examined in 167 middle class, primarily European American mother-adolescent dyads (M teen age = 15.68 years, SD = .64, 53 % female). Each construct was best described by three profiles, one where adolescents' standardized ratings were consistently higher than mothers', one showing the reverse, and one revealing little disagreement. Adolescent-reported problem behavior (but not depression), behavioral and psychological control, and mothers' wellbeing significantly predicted profile membership. Most dyads maintained consistent membership in a discrepancy profile across at least two family constructs. Results contribute to understanding the different sources of discrepancies in views of the family.
亲子差异在家庭文献中普遍存在;它们出现在关系动态报告中(例如,冲突;劳尔森等人,1998年)、父母和子女行为中(例如,监督;德洛斯雷耶斯等人,2010年)以及个体家庭成员的信念中(例如,父母的合法权威;斯梅塔纳,2011年)。差异在发展过程中是正常的(斯坦伯格,2001年),但也可能是青少年关系和适应问题的指标(奥汉尼斯安,2012年)。由于这种差异,重要的是要考虑亲子差异在多大程度上是二元组和所考虑的家庭结构的函数。本研究通过考虑在客观性方面存在差异的三种家庭结构中母亲与青少年差异的模式、一致性和相关性,有助于我们理解家庭关系中的信息提供者差异。使用以人为主的分析方法,在167个主要为欧美裔的中产阶级母亲与青少年二元组中(青少年平均年龄 = 15.68岁,标准差 = 0.64,53%为女性),研究了青少年和母亲对父母了解青少年活动的权利、母亲对这些活动的了解以及积极的母亲与青少年关系的评分差异。每种结构最好用三种概况来描述,一种是青少年的标准化评分始终高于母亲的评分,一种是相反情况,还有一种显示几乎没有分歧。青少年报告的问题行为(但不是抑郁)、行为和心理控制以及母亲的幸福感显著预测了概况归属。大多数二元组在至少两种家庭结构中保持在差异概况中的一致归属。研究结果有助于理解家庭观念差异的不同来源。