Kassab Salah E, Fida Mariam, Radwan Ahmed, Hassan Adla B, Abu-Hijleh Marwan, O'Connor Brian P
Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Department of Molecular Medicine, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Med Educ. 2016 Jul;50(7):730-7. doi: 10.1111/medu.13054.
In problem-based learning (PBL), students construct concept maps that integrate different concepts related to the PBL case and are guided by the learning needs generated in small-group tutorials. Although an instrument to measure students' concept maps in PBL programmes has been developed, the psychometric properties of this instrument have not yet been assessed.
This study evaluated the generalisability of and sources of variance in medical students' concept map assessment scores in a PBL context.
Medical students (Year 4, n = 116) were asked to construct three integrated concept maps in which the content domain of each map was to be focused on a PBL clinical case. Concept maps were independently evaluated by four raters based on five criteria: valid selection of concepts; hierarchical arrangement of concepts; degree of integration; relationship to the context of the problem, and degree of student creativity. Generalisability theory was used to compute the reliability of the concept map scores.
The dependability coefficient, which indicates the reliability of scores across the measured facets for making absolute decisions, was 0.814. Students' concept map scores (universe scores) accounted for the largest proportion of total variance (47%) across all score comparisons. Rater differences accounted for 10% of total variance, and the student × rater interaction accounted for 25% of total variance. The variance attributable to differences in the content domain of the maps was negligible (2%). The remaining 16% of the variance reflected unexplained sources of error. Results from the D study suggested that a dependability level of 0.80 can be achieved by using three raters who each score two concept map domains, or by using five raters who each score only one concept map domain.
This study demonstrated that concept mapping assessment scores of medical students in PBL have high reliability. Results suggested that greater improvements in dependability might be made by increasing the number of raters rather than by increasing the number of concept map domains.
在基于问题的学习(PBL)中,学生构建概念图,将与PBL案例相关的不同概念整合起来,并在小组辅导中产生的学习需求的引导下进行。虽然已经开发出一种用于测量PBL课程中学生概念图的工具,但该工具的心理测量特性尚未得到评估。
本研究评估了PBL背景下医学生概念图评估分数的可推广性和方差来源。
要求医学四年级学生(n = 116)构建三个综合概念图,每个图的内容领域集中于一个PBL临床案例。四名评分者根据五个标准对概念图进行独立评估:概念的有效选择;概念的层次排列;整合程度;与问题背景的关系以及学生的创造力程度。使用概化理论计算概念图分数的可靠性。
表示在进行绝对决策时跨测量方面分数可靠性的信度系数为0.814。在所有分数比较中,学生的概念图分数(全域分数)占总方差的最大比例(47%)。评分者差异占总方差的10%,学生×评分者交互作用占总方差的25%。地图内容领域差异导致的方差可忽略不计(2%)。其余16%的方差反映了无法解释的误差来源。D研究的结果表明,通过使用三名分别对两个概念图领域进行评分的评分者,或使用五名分别只对一个概念图领域进行评分的评分者,可以实现0.80的信度水平。
本研究表明,PBL中医学生的概念图评估分数具有较高的可靠性。结果表明,通过增加评分者数量而非增加概念图领域数量,可能会在信度方面取得更大的提升。