Tung Nadine, Domchek Susan M, Stadler Zsofia, Nathanson Katherine L, Couch Fergus, Garber Judy E, Offit Kenneth, Robson Mark E
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Abramson Cancer Center, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA, and the Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep;13(9):581-8. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.90. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
The use of multigene panels for the assessment of cancer susceptibility is expanding rapidly in clinical practice, particularly in the USA, despite concerns regarding the uncertain clinical validity for some gene variants and the uncertain clinical utility of most multigene panels. So-called 'moderate-penetrance' gene mutations associated with cancer susceptibility are identified in approximately 2-5% of individuals referred for clinical testing; some of these mutations are potentially actionable. Nevertheless, the appropriate management of individuals harbouring such moderate-penetrance genetic variants is unclear. The cancer risks associated with mutations in moderate-penetrance genes are lower and different than those reported for high-penetrance gene mutations (such as mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, and those associated with Lynch syndrome). The extrapolation of guidelines for the management of individuals with high-penetrance variants of cancer-susceptibility genes to the clinical care of patients with moderate-penetrance gene mutations could result in substantial harm. Thus, we provide a framework for clinical decision-making pending the development of a sufficient evidence base to document the clinical utility of the interventions for individuals with inherited moderate-penetrance gene mutations associated with an increased risk of cancer.
尽管对某些基因变异的临床有效性不确定以及大多基因检测板的临床实用性不确定存在担忧,但多基因检测板用于评估癌症易感性在临床实践中正在迅速扩展,尤其是在美国。在接受临床检测的个体中,约2%-5%的人被发现存在与癌症易感性相关的所谓“中度显性”基因突变;其中一些突变可能是可采取行动的。然而,对于携带此类中度显性基因变异个体的适当管理尚不清楚。与中度显性基因突变相关的癌症风险低于高显性基因突变(如BRCA1和BRCA2突变以及与林奇综合征相关的突变)所报告的风险,且有所不同。将癌症易感性基因高显性变异个体的管理指南外推至中度显性基因突变患者的临床护理可能会造成重大伤害。因此,在有足够证据证明针对具有遗传性中度显性基因突变且癌症风险增加的个体进行干预的临床实用性之前,我们提供了一个临床决策框架。