Blæhr Emely Ek, Kristensen Thomas, Væggemose Ulla, Søgaard Rikke
DEFACTUM, Central Denmark Region, Olof Palmes Allé 15, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.
Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark.
Trials. 2016 Jun 13;17(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1420-3.
Nonattendance at scheduled appointments in public hospitals presents a challenge for efficient resource use and may ultimately affect health outcomes due to longer waiting times. Seven percent of all scheduled outpatient appointments in the United Kingdom are estimated to be nonattended. Various reminder systems have been shown to moderately reduce nonattendance, although the effect of issuing fines for nonattendance has not yet been tested in a randomized context. However, such use of financial incentives could impact access to care differently across the different socioeconomic groups. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of fines on hospital outpatient nonattendance.
METHODS/DESIGN: A 1:1 randomized controlled trial of scheduled outpatient appointments was used, with follow-ups until the date of appointment. The setting is an orthopedic clinic at a regional hospital in Denmark. Appointments for users who are scheduled for diagnostics, treatment, surgery, or follow-ups were included from May 2015 to November 2015. Appointments assigned to the intervention arm include an attachment of the appointment letter explaining that a fine will be issued in the case of nonattendance without prior notice. Appointments assigned to the control arm follow usual practice (same system but no letter attachment). The primary outcome is the proportion of nonattendance. Secondary outcomes are proportions of cancellations, sociodemographics, and health-problem characteristics. Furthermore, the intervention costs and production value of nonattended appointments will be measured. An analysis of effect and cost-effectiveness will be conducted based on a 5 % significance level.
The study is initiated and funded by the Danish Regions, which have the responsibility for the Danish public healthcare sector. The results are expected to inform future decisions about the introduction of fines for nonattendance at public hospitals.
Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN61925912 . Registered on 6 July 2015.
公立医院预约就诊爽约对有效利用资源构成挑战,且由于等待时间延长最终可能影响健康结局。据估计,英国所有预约门诊就诊中有7%的患者爽约。各种提醒系统已显示可适度减少爽约情况,不过在随机试验中尚未对因爽约而罚款的效果进行测试。然而,这种经济激励措施的使用可能会对不同社会经济群体的就医机会产生不同影响。本研究的目的是评估罚款对医院门诊爽约的影响。
方法/设计:采用1:1随机对照试验,对预约门诊就诊进行研究,并随访至预约日期。研究地点为丹麦一家地区医院的骨科诊所。纳入2015年5月至2015年11月期间预约进行诊断、治疗、手术或随访的患者。分配到干预组的预约包含一封预约信附件,解释若未提前通知而爽约将被罚款。分配到对照组的预约遵循常规做法(相同系统但无信件附件)。主要结局是爽约比例。次要结局是取消预约的比例、社会人口统计学特征和健康问题特征。此外,还将衡量干预成本和爽约预约的产值。将基于5%的显著性水平进行效果和成本效益分析。
本研究由丹麦地区发起并资助,丹麦地区负责丹麦的公共医疗部门。预计研究结果将为未来关于在公立医院对爽约行为实施罚款的决策提供参考。
国际标准随机对照试验编号,ISRCTN61925912。于2015年7月6日注册。